Asking the Psycho Ex-Wife to Facilitate Phone Contact with the Children
Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.
Disruptive phone contact and phone call interference is something I’ve written about extensively on the blog. It is also one of the most common issues facing those who follow the blog, whether they’re checking back regularly or simply passing-through.
In the early days, given my non-custodial parent status, frequent and substantive phone calls with the children were extremely important to me. Not that they still aren’t, but my approach has changed dramatically over the years given what I am actually able to manage about the situation. Back then, it would seem I was stone-walled at every turn. There are several common tactics that the vindictive, psycho ex-wife or psycho ex-husband employ when it comes to phone contact.
- Not answering the phone at all.
- Not returning calls when messages are left.
- Hovering over the children during phone calls to “listen-in” or tell the child what to say.
- Forcing the children off of the phone abruptly.
- Interrupting the phone calls to speak to the children while they’re on the phone.
- Having the television on, loudly, to the kids’ favorite television show or movie.
- Seeking to engage the normal parent (usually in front of the children) prior to allowing the children to have the phone.
Later in the fall of 2005, well after the recorded events of the summer had come and long gone, I still was having significant problems when it came to calling the children. Despite these ongoing problems, I always made sure that the television was off and the children had a reasonable level of privacy when they were with me and PEW called, save for the period where I was recording the phone calls with PEW’s permission. I tried to get some reciprocation through another failed email effort. I did what I could, by calling at around their normal bedtime so that I didn’t interfere with expected activities that would likely be taking place earlier in the day. I rather enjoyed using that as tuck-in time given the distance.
PEW,
Phone calls - I don’t know which way would be easiest, but I’d like to come up with some sort of idea for when I call the boys. I know S2 can be ornery when it comes to phone conversations and we’ll just have to make due. But I have asked before to have them set-up someway/somehow where they will be “less distracted” when I call to chat with them but it still happens. It’s tough to have a conversation with them when they have one eye on the TV or they are involved in something. I don’t know if you can have them go to their room for a short chat when I call or if it would be easier for you to have them call me when they are set-up at some point when they are ready to settle down for the evening - but it would be helpful if you could assist me with this. I’m not sure what else to suggest.
Let me know what you think.
~LM
For those who follow the low-contact principles that I beg of you to maintain, the comment “let me know what you think” isn’t one of those things you should be doing. Nothing invites an escalation more… than an invitation such as this. Make requests without inviting feedback. Chances are you know it will be denial and/or refusal. Asking them to send it back to you is silly. Truth be told - when you’re dealing with the high-conflict ex, you probably are best served not making the suggestions at all.
LM,
As far as the phone calls, I try my best to make sure there are minimal distractions when you call. As you know, by the time I get home with them it is approximately 5:45, this gives me about 2 hours to do dinner, homework, baths, spend some quality time with them, etc, etc… Two hours is not a lot of time and I have many additional responsibilities besides your phone call, not that the phone call isn’t important because it is very important. Here are my thoughts, I will do my best on my end, but you are going to have to do your best to get them to attend to the conversation, however you can. Please stop harrassing me about this. They don’t always want to talk to me when I call them at your house and guess what, I understand. The most important thing that you need to realize is that the conversations are for them, not for you. When they need to talk to their daddy, they spend extra time talking to you, don’t they? I’ve heard S1 and S2 have prolonged conversations with you on nights when they really wanted to talk to you whether there was a toy in the room or not. I’m glad you want to talk to them, but it’s not my job to MAKE them talk if they don’t want to.
~PEW
Well, at no time did I ask her to “make them” talk to me. Yes, on the rare occasions when they weren’t distracted by other goings on, we did have conversations that one wouldn’t expect with children so young. That will happen when you ask them to tell you about their day and details about the things they were enjoying having done. However, by calling at bedtime, I made the effort not to interfere with her meaningful time and did so under the assumption that television, movies, video games, etc. would long be finished. Oh, and a single email about this doesn’t constitute “harassment.”
PEW,
I didn’t ask you to “make” them talk to me. I simply asked you to assist in minimizing distractions whenever possible. They will talk as long as they wish. What is tough to overcome is:
- They don’t talk because they are watching the show that is on TV.
- They hurry me off the phone because you told them that you are putting a movie in for them.
- They want to hang up because you have some other activity going on.
I call at around 8PM guessing that things may be settling down, perhaps they are getting ready for bed or similar in an effort NOT to interfere with your time.
My intent is not to “harass” you about it. My intent is to get the minimum amount of cooperation from you on matters relevant to the children and my interaction with them. It is asking no more than what I ensure for you when it is time for them to talk to you. I wouldn’t be asking again if I didn’t feel the need to based upon my experiences.
Thanks.
~LM
Continued reasoning in 2005 is the result of years of doing the same thing over and over and over and over again and expecting a different outcome. I guess I was insane by that point, probably long before.
LM,
It’s not quite like that. I always turn the TV off when they are talking to you, but it just so happened that I was doing something important the other night when you called and I couldn’t stand over them and make sure they listened to you. I do minimize the distractions.
I never tell them “let’s rush off the phone with Daddy so I can put a movie in for you”. They ask me if they can watch a movie and I say “let’s call Daddy first so you can talk to him, then I’ll put the movie in when you’re done talking”
I would have them call when they are IN bed, but then you’d be harrassing me that it was after 8 o’clock.
Your harrassment of me for every little thing has got to stop. Major issues you have with me, yes, I absolutely want to hear about, but I feel like you go out of your way to invent things to complain about when it comes to me. You have nothing else right now, so I gotta hear about the phone calls, right?
~PEW
Some lies and some excuse-making. Fact is, she NEVER turned the television or video game system off when I called. When I say “never,” I mean “NEVER.” Never. Not a single time at that point. You have to laugh at her explanation of the movie thing. She didn’t have to say “let’s rush off the phone” to get to a movie. It’s implied that the faster that they get off the phone with me, the faster that they can get to their movie. That’s a good enough defense for her. Oh, and let me be clear that at no time has she ever initiated a phone call to me from the children unless it was a call-back. Not a single time since we split until 2004. Every rare once-in-a-while, the children may ask her to call me and they do. Even those moments are rare and to be expected. For the most part, that comment by her is almost completely false, too.
It seems from the next email I sent that we must have had a phone discussion the night before. It would seem from what I say that the matter was agreed and settled. So, I seem confounded by the reply above.
PEW,
I made a simple request. I did not and do not harass you. Fact is, I reasonably discussed my concerns last night, despite your obvious sarcasm. Confounding is that you would continue today after we discussed this last night. I thought the matter was addressed and settled - you communicated that doing what you can to keep the boys from being distracted when I speak to them was not important to you. I explained why it is important to me and why it should be to you. You don’t care. I guess that’s the end of the story.
~LM
I didn’t say it was settled to my satisfaction, just that she made her position clear and there was nothing more I was going to be able to do about it.
LM,
I do care and the phone calls are important to me. If you stopped calling or caring, I would certainly have two very unhappy little boys. They need their Dad, I know that and I have always known that. I answered your email, I wasn’t continuing anything. What I said was that I try my best and sometimes I will fail because things come up that require my immediate attention.
You really need to stop portraying yourself as some sort of victim. I do my best under the circumstances, but you’re just never happy.
~PEW
Like what? What comes up at 8PM, the children’s bedtime, that requires your “immediate attention” that you can’t turn the television off or send them into the dining room or their bedroom to have some quiet discussion with their father? Answer: Nothing.
As with most things involving a psycho-ex - it’s all about power and control.


November 16th, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Oh my good lord. Those emails are literally verbatim from our PEW. The “I can’t make them talk to you” and “quit harassing me about every little thing.” Questions = Harassment.
November 16th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
I have not had regular phone contact with my daughter, ever, in her nearly 14 years. The only times she calls me are when PEG wants something from me or is trying to manipulate me.
For a while I tried to get the courts to come up with a solution to this problem, but any orders they make regarding phone contact are basically unenforceable. On the rare times I was able to get through to daughter, I could always tell she was being closely monitored and the calls were completely unnatural and uncomfortable for her.
Eventually I just gave up and decided that continuing the fight over this issue was making things harder on daughter. I decided that I would have to be content with F-2-F conversations with her when she is with me, even though this meant long periods with no contact.
So, even though I was the NCP back then (50/50 now), the only phone contact that happened on a regular/consistent basis was Mother/Daughter calls using Dad’s phone. Basically, the reverse of what one would expect. Silly, and sad.
November 16th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
This one made my stomach turn! The wording in your PEW’s emails is always SO similar to the wording our PEW uses. It’s disturbing.
You’re exactly right, it’s all about power and control.. and I might add manipulation and conflict.
November 17th, 2009 at 10:25 am
Turning off the t.v. when Dad (or mom) calls is Divorced Parent 101. I always turned it off and insisted that my daughter gave full attention to the phone call when her mom called, but this wasn’t always reciprocated, which sometimes resulted in phone conversation from my daughter that consisted of “…mmm….uh-huh….yeah………….”.
November 17th, 2009 at 3:36 pm
Mister-M - can you point to the post where you went low-contact? It is obvious at this point you were not doing it, and I am interested in reading how PEW escalated after you started.
November 17th, 2009 at 3:52 pm
Click here: Follow-Up to Low-Contact Post
I was actually surprised to find that I didn’t send the email in that post until April of 2007, so I have my recollection wrong. It was in the summer of 2005 that I discovered borderline personality disorder. I learned of low-contact methodology some time after that and, obviously, made my effort to get in line with it near the summer of 2007 and not 2005.
November 18th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
Can you please explain some things?? New to your blog and so far really love it. I have read things that my husbands PEW does and the way you explain it has really opened my eyes and helped me to connect the dots. I can’t wait to read more….
But I am very confused and your blogs, although great, I feel very lost.
What is your custody situation like now? I mostly read the 2005 calls. But then I read where you bought her Christmas gifts?? I really did not understand that one. It almost sounded like you got back together with her. But you kept calling her PEW. Forgive me for coming on this late in your blog and being confused. There is a lot of information…but a quick recap for me would be awesome
You can e-mail me or whatever is best. Thanks, Debbie
November 18th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
Your post made me laugh! I think I understand what you’re saying here and I ran into that problem shortly after I started the blog. I never expected it to get the attention and grow as it has over the years. When I started it was about “current events” at the time and so I had to start backfilling pieces of the overall puzzle.
Fortunately, about a year ago, I went back and added YEAR labels to the posts that about life with PEW. So, if you want to work through things in chronological order (mostly), use the YEAR LABELS on the right hand side of the blog (2000, 2001, 2002, 2003…) While each year may have stories that are not in perfect chronology within it (depending upon what I felt like writing about at any given moment), if you use the YEAR LABELS to play catch-up… that would be the easiest way to do it.
Thanks for reading and commenting.
November 20th, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Mister M….Thank you for the explanation of how to navigate your site…very helpful.
I feel your DW’s pain and some of yours as well (I say some because I’m not a guy and the ex in my situation is not my ex but his…as in your case) Anyways, I think you get what I’m saying
lol
I do have an ex…but he’s just a loser. I always knew women were evil and now living with one in my life (hubby’s ex) and seeing what you and DW have gone through there is no doubt in my mind that I am positively correct in saying so
I’m not saying men are not evil…if you knew my story about my ex when we were married you’d know that wasn’t the case. But I have long forgiven him and he does not cause me the drama that so many people love to create and participate in.
You have inspired me to write my own blog. I’m sure it will not be anywhere near as great as yours. I do not have emails and such from encounters that have happened and recorded calls (although I wish I had) Anyways, I love to write and I’m hoping that it will be more of a healing site then anything else. I do have some juicy letters though written by ex wife to the courts in her moms handwriting that I will be posting though…those get me riled up but I’m sure they’ll be some good reading and some good laughs lol.
My site’s url is: http://preacherskidabusesinglemomstepmom.blogspot.com/ I just started it today but have a “summary” story that I wrote a few years ago about myself on there. Thanks for your site again and thanks for being an inspiration to me to start my own blog
Many hugs and good wishes to you and DW along with SS1, SD1, S1 and S2. Happy Holidays, hope this year is better
December 4th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
I found your site yesterday and am loving it! My ex-wife in-law is the epitome of PEW–with clear Borderline PD (in our own armchair diagnosis), currently being divorced by her 7th husband. She currently has two concurrent custody battles: us, for my husband’s two children; and one for her 7th husband’s child. Our interstate custody matter has taken over two years, thus far. Reading your blog entries is like reading from our own story, almost verbatim. I’m shocked by the parallels, especially in the topic of communication interference and parental alienation. I’m also shocked that this brand of CHILD ABUSE is still so closeted and practically encouraged by the system! How is the OBVIOUS link between this and societal decline not acknowledged???
I just want to thank you for providing an avenue of support and empathy for us…and our new beloved “extended family”: 7th ex-husband and their precious baby.