More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Phone Call Series: Lies, Manipulation, Custodial Interference, Parental Alienation - Part 8

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

After Part 7 of the custodial interference via phone calls series, we begin winding things down and we’ll make this the conclusion of the series.

For one thing - I’ve beaten this topic to death, but felt it was important to see how a child’s mind can be influenced by a disordered parent.  Parental alienation exists and it’s an effective tool of the malicious ex-partner when left unaddressed.  When it’s done on the phone, you’re not very likely to figure out what the hell is going on and why.  I know I didn’t.  I had my suspicions, but could never prove anything.  The recordings simply confirmed those suspicions.  The other reason this is the conclusion is that after this phone call, she would refuse to allow the recording of phone calls.

The was one phone call between the one I document today and the one detailed in Part 7.  It was more of the same where she initiated discussions about the things she had bought them and that was the bulk of their discussion.  Again - it contained nothing about what they were doing or did or anything about the kids.  It was all about the gifts, all about PEW, and all about practically counting the minutes until they would be reunited again.

In this phone call, which took place after our August 2005 court hearing and during my next custodial time, we discuss a disciplinary action I took because S1 refused to eat his dinner.  We were supposed to go fishing at the lake.  His refusal to participate in dinner cost him that excursion.  If you’ve read any of the stories in the discipline category - you’ll realize that the approaches to discipline between PEW and I are quite different.  She has none.  I do.  There is no means of discipline I could impose that PEW will ever think is appropriate.  This makes sense because she simply has no concept of boundaries, expectations, or managing the children’s behavior (in positive ways or through appropriate disciplinary action).  Aside from her outbursts, smacking them in the mouth or head, or bull-rushing them into fearful situations, she just couldn’t bring herself to depart from the buddy-buddy Disneyland Mom gift-giving role, probably because she viewed the children’s disappointment at having to be punished as them not loving her.  See: Abandonment Issues.

As a result - she informs the children that they don’t have to follow the rules at our home.  Further, she undermines my punishment by promising them a fishing trip when they got home.  (Of course, in keeping with the theme that she doesn’t do much with the kids directly, someone else - her brother - would be responsible for providing that.)  After opening with our mutual recording exchanges, she starts her conversations with S2.  In his usual fashion, he was short and got off the phone quickly.  Nothing too unusual about the discussion.  Then, “the target” we know and love as S1 got on the phone…

S1: Hi, mom.
PEW: Hi, S1 How are you doing?
S1: Good.
PEW: What’s the matter?
S1: I was crying because I couldn’t go fishing today.
PEW: Oh. Awww. Why you crying still? You can go fishing another day.
S1: (a little whiney) I know but, I really don’t… just so you know, when I’m being babysitted by Aunt Psycho-SIL, I really don’t do anything. Okay? I’m just home and I don’t like being home, so. You know?
PEW: (serious tone) What do you mean?

#1 - He wasn’t crying.  He did that back then.  He would say he was crying, but he wasn’t crying.  He’s telling her what he knows she wants to hear.  Also, when I say “serious tone” - it doesn’t convey how the hair on my neck stands up when I hear “that voice.”  “That voice” is the one that indicates that the switch has been thrown.  It’s the mean “I’m about to explode” voice.  I still can visualize the steely eyes, the blank look that overcomes her face, and the knowledge that she’s about to go over the deep end. Fortunately, the end of that description doesn’t happen and she pulls it together, instead trying to convince S1 that he has a wonderful time when with her and family members.

S1: I just don’t like being home because you don’t take me going fishing, you don’t take me to the park, you know. Mostly I’m just hanging out at home all the time.
PEW: Well, why are you saying that when Aunt Psycho-SIL took you to Chuck E. Cheese, she took you to, ummm… she took you to see Willy Wonka… she took you to…

Later in this exchange, I’ll point out an important pattern that develops…

S1: Yeah, but I mean like cool stuff like fishing or exploring in the woods and stuff. Stuff like that.
PEW: Oh. Okay, what are you saying?
S1: What?
PEW: What are you saying to me? What about camp? Do you like camp?

Hey PEW, he’s saying it sucks when you leave him at home with your drunk and disorderly sister.  Does a 6-year old have to spell it out for you?  Sheesh.

S1: What?
PEW: Do you like going to camp?
S1: No, I hate camp. (continues slightly whiney) I don’t like it at all. Okay? I hate it.
PEW: Okay. What do you want to do when you’re home, I mean…
S1: What?
PEW: Don’t you think those things were fun things to do? We went to Chuck E. Cheese and, what else did you guys do?
S1: I don’t know.
PEW: And Aunt Psycho-SIL took you to the park, remember, where [Frankie] lives?
S1: Yeah.
PEW: Yeah. So are you making up stories? Why are you saying you don’t do stuff with me? You do lots of stuff with Aunt Psycho-SIL.
S1: Well, I mean like fishing and exploring in the woods, that’s what I’m talking about.
PEW: Okay. Well, I don’t have a lake, but [Grandmom] has a pool and we go swimming there all the time.
S1: Yeah, but we can find a lake!
PEW: Well, what’s wrong with swimming in the pool?
S1: What?
PEW: What’s wrong with swimming in the pool at [Grandmom's] house?
S1: I don’t know.
PEW: You don’t know?
S1: Yeah, I just like fishing.
PEW: You like what?
S1: I only like fishing.
PEW: All right, well, when you were with Psycho-FIL, you fished like, 5-times. We can go fishing when you come home. I know how to fish.

He’s talking about something other than getting the latest goldfish out of the fish tank at Petco, PEW.

S1: All right.
PEW: All right.
S1: Okay, so…
PEW: Why are you crying, S1, I don’t understand what you’re upset about.

Again she suggests he’s crying.  He’s not.  But he will be in short order…

S1: (whining) Well, it’s because I didn’t get to go fishing. (Something else inaudible)
PEW: You don’t get to do everything you want to do.
S1: Well, it’s just because I didn’t eat dinner I didn’t get to.
PEW: Oh, because you didn’t eat dinner?
S1: (whining) Because I didn’t like the pasta stuff and I didn’t like the meatballs.
PEW: Oh. Well, that’s daddy’s rule, that’s not my rule. What do you want me to do?

That’s PEW’s parenting style.  She asks 6-year old, “What do you want me to do?” She does this after indicating that it isn’t “her” rule.  For the record, S1 loves pasta and meatballs.  DW and I make home made pasta gravy, I make home made meatballs, and all of the kids love it.  The problem on this evening is that S1 was so jazzed up to go fishing, I think he believed he would get there faster by skipping dinner.

S1: I don’t know. (Whining which transitions to crying – inaudible)
PEW: What, baby?
S1: What? What mom? What did you say? (still crying)
PEW: But you know you can’t go fishing all the time. When you come home next… we’ll go fishing when you come home next week. Okay?
S1: (crying) (inaudible)
PEW: What? What do you want to do?
S1: I want to go fishing while we (inaudible) somewhere.
PEW: Okay.
S1: Okay.
PEW: I’ll take you fishing, don’t worry. I love you.

So much for Dad’s disciplinary measure.  She just blew it out of the water, undermining me by promising to take him fishing.  On the surface, this might seem completely normal.  Mom is going to take son fishing.  It’s the reason that she’s taking him fishing - because Dad didn’t take him because he refused to eat dinner.  She still doesn’t understand that she is “building” a manipulative little boy with her antics.

S1: All right.
PEW: Are you okay?
S1: (now not crying) Yeah.
PEW: You’re okay?
S1: (not crying) Yeah.
PEW: All right, well we’ll do a lot of fishing when you come home. Okay?
S1: All right.

Think I’m wrong?  Cry… mom promises something, in this case - fishing… crying immediately stops.  You could actually be a bad parent and recognize this pattern.  PEW can’t/doesn’t/won’t.  I’m not sure which one.

PEW: Oh, [Uncle Youngest Brother] just said that he’ll take you fishing.
S1: What?
PEW: [Uncle Youngest Brother] just said that he’ll take you fishing, too.

Notice the pattern, yet?  The pattern is, she speaks about the things that the boys do with a whole bunch of other people - but not PEW! This is very common behavior on the part of PEW.  The boys did things with Aunt Psycho-SIL.  The boys did things with Grandmom and Grandpop.  The boys did things with their Uncles.  At no time did PEW ever explain to S1 anything that SHE actually did with them.  Further, when she DID do things with them, almost always it was done with someone else present.

S1: Okay.
PEW: He’s here. And uh, he’s here with [cousin] today and [cousin] and [his wife]. We’re at Grandmom’s.
S1: What?
PEW: Okay?
S1: All right.
PEW: So, are you all right, S1?
S1: (begins crying again) No, I just really want to see you. (inaudible)
PEW: I’m having a hard time hearing you, buddy.
S1: Okay, I don’t like it here.
PEW: You don’t like it there?
S1: I’m all right Mom. (still crying)
PEW: You only have like 5 more days.

Man, I hate that.  “You ONLY have 5 more days.”  Could she prompt any more dread in the mind of an impressionable young boy?  Your time at the Gulag will be over soon… IF YOU SURVIVE… MUWAAAAHAHAHAHAHA!!!” Disgraceful.

S1: All right.
PEW: I love you S1, you’ll be all right. What don’t you like? The rules?
S1: Right. (still crying)
PEW: But you like being with your Dad, right?
S1: Right. Can you just, not use Daddy’s rules list? Because I don’t like those rules.
PEW: Oh.
S1: What?
PEW: Well, at least when you come home you don’t have to listen to those rules. I got my own rules, right?

What rules would those be, PEW?  Rule #1 - Anything goes.  Rule #2 - See rule #1.  S1 manipulates and she’s on the hook.  The boy is a good fisherman.

S1: Right.
PEW: So don’t worry about it. We’ll go fishing, [Uncle Youngest Brother] will take you fishing, and we’ll have a good time when you get home.

“Someone else will do something with you and it will be fun.  And when you come home from your fishing trip with someone else, we’ll talk about me.”

S1: Okay.
PEW: Are you crying for me or are you crying because you don’t like to follow the rules?
S1: I’m crying because I don’t like to follow the rules and because I miss you. It’s just because I miss you. (sobs and whines)
PEW: S1. Is daddy there?
S1: No, because I’m in the bathroom talking to you.
PEW: You’re in the bathroom?
S1: Yes, I wanted to talk in here because I don’t want people hearing when I talk.

Remember this for when I provide you the next link, because I’ve already posted some of this overall phone discussion.  S1 is upstairs in the house.  Everyone else is downstairs.  He voluntarily went up and into the bathroom for the very reason he states.  He’s blowing smoke up her ass and he doesn’t want anyone to hear it.

PEW: Oh. Why, does daddy get mad at you because you say you miss me?

Objection your honor!  Leading the witness (again).  S1 didn’t say any such thing.  Not in any phone call at all.  She plants the seed knowing he’ll say “yes” and then she can claim he told her that.

S1: Yes.
PEW: Why?
S1: Because I say it every day.
PEW: Oh.
S1: Right after the first day because that’s when I start.
PEW: All right, well you know your mommy loves you, right? And when you get home and when you get home in 5 days, right, and then we’ll have lots of fun.
S1: Okay.
PEW: Actually it’s 6 days, but, I love you and Mom-Mom loves you, and Aunt Psycho-SIL and [Uncle Youngest Brother and his wife]…

Yes, everyone else loves you way more than your father does and when you get home I will shower you with gifts and love and you don’t have to follow any rules and you can do whatever you want…

S1: All right (sobs)
PEW: All right
S1: Yes.
PEW: Why don’t you put your dad on the phone so I can talk to him for a second.
S1: When can I talk to you again.
PEW: What?
S1: When can I talk to you again?
PEW: Okay. But I think your dad should be comforting you when you’re this upset. You know?
S1: But (inaudible)
PEW: What?
S1: (inaudible)
PEW: You hear [cousin]? You hear him yelling?
S1:
[...has gone to get Dad]

It is here that I get on the phone and the discussion detailed in the post Top 10 Household Rules and Consequences takes place.  You can click on that link to read it.  I’ll wait for you to come back and you can continue from here.  GO!  I’ll wait, I promise…

Okay, carrying on…

That post ended where she changed the subject, and this post will pick it up from there…

PEW: Did you get my last email?
LM: No, I haven’t been on the computer in a while.
PEW: You’re not gonna like it.
LM: What, it’s probably chock-full of name-calling I’m sure. Didn’t your lawyer warn you against that?
PEW: No, he said I could answer your emails with whatever I feel is necessary. If I’m not threatening you in any way, I’m not like, umm, you know, I’m not like neglecting my kids.
LM: Okay. I’m sure it will be highly amusing.
PEW: Not as amusing as yours. So.
LM: Something else?
PEW: Yeah, what’s S1 doing right now?
LM: He’s sitting down, watching a movie with a smile on his face. Then he’ll get back on the phone and probably cry to you. Just minding his own business like he was before he got on the phone with you.
PEW: Yeah because he told me that you get upset when he tells me he misses me. He’s not allowed to express himself.

See how the twisted mind distorts reality? He didn’t tell her any such thing. She told him that and he replied affirmatively. This is what she does. She’s the PEW.

LM: I do not get upset when S1 says he misses you.
PEW: Like any 7-year old boy that…
LM: (interrupts) PEW, I’m gonna tell you one more time, I do not get upset when he misses you.
PEW: You’re a liar. You’re a liar.
LM: No, I do not.
PEW: And S2 told me you said it breaks your heart when he says that he misses me. That’s what he told me when he was home.
LM: No. That’s not what I said.
PEW: And trust me, I tell my lawyer everything.
LM: That’s fine.
PEW:
(I believe to someone else present on her end) He tells the kids that it breaks his heart that they say they want to go home or they miss me.
LM: See, you have to understand that kids sometimes get things mixed up. And what I said was that it breaks my heart when all you want to do is go home. We have things to do here, we have to spend time together, and that all you do is talk about… because you prompt them by telling them about the gekkos… that’s all you know how to talk about is the lizards, the gecko, you’re feeding them, they miss you – you encourage them to want to go home. And what I have to do is to try to undo that damage that you do, and I tell them, “when all you want to do is rush home to your gekkos, that breaks my heart. Because we’re having fun here, we’re doing things together, it’s important that you spend time with me…” These are things that you’re supposed to be doing that you don’t do. Okay. And that’s what I said. I never, ever said that it breaks my heart when they miss you. I tell them that I know that you miss your mother. I understand that you miss your mother. You love your mother very much and she loves you, but you have to understand that you have to spend time with both of us. That’s what I tell them each and every time. And I understand that S2 might have gotten things mixed up during the course of a conversation we may have had. But one thing that, as God as my witness, that I do not say to those kids is that it breaks my heart when they tell me that you miss mommy. They tell me that every day. And I understand.

Even so, looking back on this, I shouldn’t have used that phrase. I probably should have used “upset” or “disappointed.”

PEW: When I say, that, they got hysterical the day before they were coming home and it took me an hour to calm them down, all I kept saying is that your dad loves you and he wants to spend time with you, He misses you.
LM: Yeah, but you see, this is after a systematic week of you buying stuff and then you prompting them to ask me to come home early. And they get hysterical on the phone because you’re encouraging that behavior. Okay.
PEW: I’m not encouraging it.

Just lies right through her teeth, she does…

LM: You are encouraging it, PEW.
PEW: But I’ll tell you what, I don’t mind them crying as much as I mind them saying like, that, they had to hide in the bathroom to talk about it.
LM: S1 did not…
PEW: Because he’s afraid that you’ll get upset.
LM: I will not get upset.
PEW: Well, I hope you’re giving him lots of hugs and reassurance.
LM: Absolutely, and I told… we had talked about why we didn’t go fishing today, we were up in the bedroom by ourselves just chatting away…
PEW: (interrupts) That was your decision, to take away his fishing trip because he didn’t eat all of his dinner?
LM: He didn’t eat any of his dinner.
PEW: That’s not the consequence for not eating dinner.

Of course not.

LM: Yes it is. It was the consequence…
PEW: (interrupts) You decided to jerk him around.
LM: No, that was the consequence tonight. In order get the things that you want, you have to do the right thing and you have to eat your meals.
PEW: It’s not the consequence on the list, though, is it? It’s whatever consequence you feel like giving him that’s going to hurt him as badly as possible.

Flip-flopper now chooses to reference the list that she previously decided to trash.  Much like the mind of a child, she comes at me with, “But that’s not a consequence on the list.” Seriously.

LM: No, that’s not true.
PEW: Well, I really think that you’re seriously a warped individual…
LM:
(interrupts) It’s not a fishing trip, we walk down the lake and we fish in the lake. Stop making it out to be a big deal. We were fishing yesterday and we’ll go fishing tomorrow as long as he does the right things during the day. That’s the way it works.
PEW: It was a big deal to him, though.
LM: I understand that, but guess what? You don’t get to do the things that you want if you don’t do the things that you’re supposed to do. It’s real simple cause-and-effect situation that most reasonable people encourage. Okay? They don’t get snacks when they don’t do the right things, they don’t get enjoy special things when they don’t do the right things. Now, I know that this is a problem for you to understand, but don’t sit here and act like it’s abnormal, it’s not, PEW.
PEW: You’re abnormal, LM.

The mind of a child at work…

LM: I know how you feel about me, stop. It really doesn’t bother me anymore that you call me names, okay?
PEW: I think it does.

The mind of a child at work…

LM: I know, that’s why you do it. You’re going to keep doing it because that’s all you know how to do. But the fact is, this is not unreasonable.
PEW: Well, until you do what’s right by your children, until you do the right thing…
LM: (interrupts) I am doing just that. I am doing just that.
PEW: You’re not doing the right things.
LM: Yes, I am.
PEW: If you were doing the right thing, they would be coming home today. And then, they would come back to you next week.
LM: They would be coming home today?
PEW: Yeah, they would be doing a week there and a week here. But no, you had to drag me all the way down to… to take exactly would I offered you in the first place.
LM: Hang on. Before you get started on this course, I’ve got to make sure I don’t run out of tape because this is going to be priceless. So let me see if I can flip the tape over before you get started and you can tell me how I dragged you wherever it is you think I dragged you. Oh, nope, we’re still rolling, go ahead.
PEW: I offered you half the summer and what did you wind up with?

More than that.

LM: I have nothing to say regarding the court stuff, I just want to let you go off. Go on.
PEW: No, I said what did you wind up with, that I offered you, in the beginning? Half the summer, right? But you weren’t satisfied with the fact that I said when they get a little bit older, like when S2 is about S1’s age, a whole summer wouldn’t be out of the question, but no, you had to…
LM: (interrupts) What did Gloria recommend?
PEW: What did Gloria recommend? Uhhhhh…
LM: Uhhhhh… you know what she recommended.
PEW: She must…
LM: The only thing I got was because there are other issues that need to be ironed out, otherwise, you would have had two weeks this summer. Okay? That’s the reality.
PEW: No, you know what? That’s not the reality.
LM: That is the reality.
PEW: Because I would have appealed that.

I didn’t give a shit what she would have done.  She would have had 2-weeks in the summer time.  She can’t force her lips to admit the truth!  Back then, it was frustrating as all hell.  Now, all I can do is laugh at it.  You can almost see her slamming her eyes shut, covering her ears, and yelling, “LALALALALALA I CAN’T HEAR YOU!!!”

LM: I know, because remember… because you said, because you said what you said you weren’t going to say, which is that I pulled the wool over Gloria’s eyes, I fooled her, etcetera etcetera, right?
PEW: Right.
LM: All right. I’ve had enough of talking to you. So, do you want to speak to S1 some more?
PEW: Yes.
LM: Okay.

At this point, the tape ran out and I obviously didn’t realize that.  The very next phone call, when I informed her that it would be taped, she declined permission to allow it and so that will end the transcripts here.  I’m sure this 8-part mess was dreadful enough to endure.

So, I believe now is a good time to suggest that you give yourself a refresher on low-contact by clicking here: Appropriate Means of Contact With High-Conflict Personalities

You can’t read it enough.  Learn it.  Live it.  Love it.  It makes a tremendously positive difference if you’re stuck in the cycles like I was during my marriage to PEW and throughout the first half (or so) of the split.  If you’re in a new relationship - it can be a relationship-saver.  I’ve lost count of the number of emails I’ve received from people who have reported everything from reduced stress to literally saving marriages.

Good luck if you’re going through this type of mess.  Go low-contact.  If you don’t have children - go no-contact.

30 Responses to “Phone Call Series: Lies, Manipulation, Custodial Interference, Parental Alienation - Part 8”

  1. Jennifer Says:

    A quick question: If the consequence for not eating “most of the meal” was to lose snack, why did the fishing trip get canceled?

  2. Mister-M Says:

    Of everything you’ve read in this post - that’s your main concern?

    LM: He didn’t eat any of his dinner.

  3. Jennifer Says:

    No, that’s not ALL I got out of this. Based on what I read, it was S1 who said he really wanted to see his mother, that he didn’t like it at your house, AND that he missed her BEFORE your ex said anything about it to him.

    I was merely thinking that consistency in parenting is paramount, and it appeared that you did not follow your own rule/consequence that you had laid our for your children. I’m hoping you didn’t punish the younger son as well, because of his brother’s misdeed.

  4. Chrissy Says:

    I know that legally you probably had to have her consent to record, but since the extreme drama and time wasting she caused, I’m wondering why you didn’t just refuse to take her calls unless you could, or that you could just do so for your own protection.

    I think the rules vary state to state.

    I would have just hung up so long ago.

    Is or was she ever on drugs or drinking?

    It’s just so beyond exhausting, the repetitive BS.

    Clearly she is obsessed when they are with you.
    Can you comment on her when they are not with you, like when you would call them?
    Did or does she interfere?

  5. Mister-M Says:

    Well, Jennifer, then it would seem your reading comprehension skills need a little work.

    The consistency that you speak of is paramount, but not to the complete exclusion of all other options. Further, there is a significant difference in the matter above versus what’s documented in the household rules list.

    When you consider that the child has been trained to tell her what she wants to hear over the course of several weeks of these mind-bending phone conversations, he won’t always have to wait for prompting.

    Finally, if you go back and actually read the post from the top, she asks, “How are you doing?” S1 responds, “Good.” To that she replies, “What’s the matter?” So your contention that it was unprompted is incorrect as well.

    You’re arguing just like “Bob” and “Liz” did previously on this blog. It starting to make me wonder, “Jennifer.” We all know how that turned out.

  6. Mister-M Says:

    Chrissy… back then, there was significant interference or distraction when I called the children when with her. I actually attempted to address it in an email in the fall of 2005. Perhaps I’ll post that one on Monday.

    As for “just hanging up” - the reality is, I just shouldn’t have talked to her for as long as I did and in the manner that I did. Old, well-established marital dance we did quite well. Further, doing so would have interfered with her phone contact with the children and I wasn’t going to risk contempt, despite what she was doing at the time.

  7. Jennifer Says:

    I simply was trying to understand why your rule/consequence didn’t apply here. It makes sense that he was upset.

    I’m sure you simply blocked “Bob” and “Liz” from being able to post comments because they didn’t agree with you.

  8. Mister-M Says:

    Actually, both “Bob” and “Liz” were the PEW. In addition to having a conversation with herself, much like you they repeatedly stated the same incorrect conclusion in the face of factual evidence to refute it, just as you have here.

    It’s one thing to simply disagree. It’s entirely another to be factually inaccurate. Why am I not surprised you don’t see that? “Jennifer.”

  9. Chrissy Says:

    I think Jennifer is PEW too.
    Anyone of any reasonable intelligence who has read every word of this site, as you said, THIS is the point they get out of it???

    It is clear to anyone who is not BPD or Psycho, that the children ARE getting programmed.
    It is the most difficult thing for them to comprehend, them being consciously or subconsciously, forced to take sides.

    Without them being in any true sort of danger,
    I can’t imagine a mother having a conversation with a 6 and 4 year old, being anything other than, having fun, I love you, have more fun.

    Any divorced women I know, are so happy to have the break when the ex takes the kids for the weekends and such.
    They do not miss their children to the point of obsession.

    It’s just about the only way to get back at them, from the father.
    DON’T take them.
    DON’T give her a break.

    It’s all unfortunate for the kids.

    My boyfriends soon to be ex has threatened the papers so many times, we are anxiously awaiting them today!

    We’re kind of giving her the chance to serve him, because if he serves her, we truly anticipate her objecting and fighting, but the other way around, she will only look like the idiot.

    Twenty months we’re waiting now.
    We’re giving her until the end of January, after the holidays.
    Per this website, we have all activities recorded.

  10. admin Says:

    I think Jennifer also missed the entire part where S1 says he hates it at PEWs house and how they never do anything. Keep in mind S1 can be a master manipulator, especially back then, because it worked with PEW. It still works with PEW, but he’s learned it doesn’t work with us. It’s the same with eating his dinner, he wasn’t interested in dinner or doing anything else he needed to do because he was ready to go fishing. Sorry, not how life works, I don’t just get to say I’m not doing my work because I want to go fishing right now.

    Also, just because something isn’t on the rules list doesn’t mean it won’t be addressed, lol, I guess if one of the kids killed a cat down the street we couldn’t do anything because it wasn’t on the list *rollseyes*.

  11. Mister-M Says:

    *Note to self* - add “cat killing” to the rules list…

  12. Jennifer Says:

    Wow, you guys are funny. Don’t let anyone ever disagree with you. Dang. The meal thing WAS on the list…I was just asking about inconsistency.
    I picked up on the part that S1 stated he hated it at PEW’s house…but he specifically references SIL. (Which would support your argument that she lived there.)
    Yes, I know “Bob” and “Liz” were believed to be PEW. I simply stated you had probably blocked her from posting.

    I’m sorry, guys, but it takes two to create conflict. Whether it’s you guys and PEW, or you and I… I prefer to abstain.

  13. Mister-M Says:

    Jennifer - we have no problem with people disagreeing. I welcome dissenting opinion when it’s not intended to be deliberately disruptive (as a rare few have seen fit to attempt). This is a common complaint of dissenters. I am “letting you” disagree with me/us by allowing your posts to continue. If I wasn’t “letting” you disagree, your posts would vanish and I would block you from responding further.

    Now, it’s too early to tell if that’s what you’re doing, but one thing is clear - you’re still failing to acknowledge the difference between refusing to eat any dinner what’s on the previously mentioned “list.”

    As with several other areas where I pointed out your failure to acknowledge reality - “Bob” and “Liz” weren’t “believed to be” PEW. They were absolutely PEW.

    If you want to have meaningful discourse, at least you could have the courtesy of acknowledging where you were abundantly incorrect in your assessments. You can still disagree and simply say, “I don’t think disallowing him to go fishing was appropriate.” What I will take exception to is your claim that the punishment is either inappropriate or certainly inconsistent with the list. What happened in the instance above and what is detailed on the list are two different scenarios.

    I’ll also reiterate my point that, the list isn’t intended to totally restrict something else from being used as a disciplinary measure. Consistency depends upon the nature of the circumstances.

    Much like the PEW, you can make false claims and assumptions until the cows come home. And I can sit here and repeatedly point out to you the problems with your replies. So, either you just enjoy the attention and engagement, like the PEW does, or you’re unwilling or unable to accept that you’re wrong in the areas where I pointed it out, with supporting evidence.

  14. evil_stepmom Says:

    I don’t view this as fishing was taken away as a punishment for not eating his dinner. I look at it more as there were requirements that had to be met in order to be allowed to go fishing, which would therefore make the list of rules & consequences irrelevant.

  15. Trisha Says:

    Mister-M I 100% agree with S1’s punishment, and I do believe you handle situations with regard to parenting and handling your PEW wonderfully. That being said, you are annoyingly defensive in the comments section. It is grating to read.

    Forgive if I’m wrong, but you stated above “You can still disagree and simply say, “I don’t think disallowing him to go fishing was appropriate.” What I will take exception to is your claim that the punishment is either inappropriate or certainly inconsistent with the list.”

    Go back and re-read it. You completely contradicted yourself. In the first sentence you told Jennifer it was fine if she thought the punishment was inappropriate and in the next sentence you told her you take exception to her saying it’s inappropriate. And you know what, it doesn’t even matter that you misspoke - it’s not a big deal. But if someone else had made a similar mistake you’d be all over them for it. You just get so mean spirited in your replies.

    I love reading your blog, but I am just done with the comments. You need to relax and not take every single comment so seriously. YOU are the one causing the disruption. But it’s your blog, so of course you can do whatever you want.

    Have a nice weekend.

  16. Mister-M Says:

    Trish, I appreciate what you’re saying. I don’t believe I contradicted myself as I was speaking as Jennifer’s comments related to “the list.” If Jennifer doesn’t repeatedly (erroneously) reference “the list” when making her comments, I don’t have the compulsion to point out how she’s wrong.

    And yes - when people get annoying offensive and ignorant about what is written, I do have a tendency to get annoyingly defensive addressing it. This is a born of spending a significant part of my lifetime doing the very same things within the confines of my marriage to PEW - defending myself (too much and too long) against ridiculous accusations. Old habits… they say…

  17. Trisha Says:

    Mister M I am amazed. I fully expected you to rail me… I feel compelled to retract my previous comment…you are truly capable of admitting a weakness, which definitley makes you no longer defensively annoying.

    Your Loyal Reader,
    Trisha

  18. Trisha Says:

    Unrelated question: I can’t find it anywhere…when did you ban PEW (Bill and Liz) from commenting? I mean when did you decide her comments weren’t adding anything to the discussion? I used to really get a kick out of it when she would have conversations with herself… =(

  19. Mister-M Says:

    WEAKNESS!??!!?! WHO SAID ANYTHING ABOUT WEAKNESS?!?!?! I ADMITTED NO SUCH THING DAMMIT…

    I admit to being annoying and occasionally defensive. If I didn’t admit that, whatever credibility I may have would be right out the window, Trish.

    As for the unrelated question - look at the third “most comments” post on the right side of the blog (The Inevitable Discovery) and click on the category tag “Open Letter to PEW.”

  20. admin Says:

    FYI, LM needed a smiley on that last comment, lol, he was joking with that first sentence.

  21. Mister-M Says:

    It made me laugh as I typed it! So, yes… that was meant in jest.

  22. Manibeaux Says:

    Oh lord. Seriously? PEW = “Trisha,” “Jennifer,” etc. ad nauseum.

    Really, is anyone going to object to the taking away of a privilege (not a right, a PRIVILEGE) because the kid didn’t listen to the rules? You have to eat your dinner before we go do XYZ. You don’t eat it? You don’t go. The. End.

    Is this really so difficult to comprehend?

    Read the previous posts before commenting without the benefit of context. It is an ongoing pattern. The children (well, SS1 at least) are learning to manipulate both parents, thanks to the infinite (un)wisdom of PEW. “Consequences, shmonsequences. You can do whatever you want, sweetie. I will indulge you no matter how you behave.”

    Let’s reconvene about 15 years from now, when both kids are out in the working world, and see how well that lesson served them.

  23. Kmorgan Says:

    My sentiments exactly manibeaux! When a parent disciplines, the other needs to back the disciplining parent up. Then, if you disagree you can discuss it when the kids are not around. But they need to see a united front when it comes to discipline.
    MrM and admin (dw? I assume) I liked the joke and if anyone didn’t know the first sentence was just that then they haven’t been reading your blog long enough! You both are funny and I laugh regularly at the commentary! (unfortunately if your commentary wasn’t so funny and entertaing the real issues of the blog would just be too sad to read. It seems to be a way to keep your sanity. I think I laugh about my situation in order to keep from crying…Don’t get me wrong, I’m happy but sometimes the individual problems make me sad and frustrated and if I didn’t laugh at them they would overwhelm me.
    It’s interesting how punishments and consequences while basically the same thing have a different sound or connotation… One you have imposed and the latter the child has chosen based on behavior good or bad. Raising kids is a joy! I love giving our daughter choices because the consequences are her responsibility. That’s a good thing.
    Thanks for posting. It is helpful and I appreciate your dedication. I have to admit though I haven’t found info on your current status with the kids,pew,custody arrangement, court orders, etc. I have to admit I’m currious and I appologize If I’m jumping ahead as you are on 2005, but I just hope it has turned out better than then.
    Last thing, are you going to post what happened at the court hearing that would have occurred between part 7 and 8. Just curious how she ended up with the driving incident and the contempt threats. I can only imagine that judge contempt was non too pleased!
    Sincerely
    KMorgan

  24. Mister-M Says:

    Click Here, KMorgs: Custody Evaluation 2 Results, Rebuttal, Hearing

  25. TheMostMom Says:

    Mr M,
    LOW-CONTACT REMINDER!!!
    Jennifer was obviously PEW, from the first comment. Don’t let her engage you. Clarify her errors once, then let her jabs go unresponded to… she’ll remain “annoyingly offensive and ignorant” and you’ll remain… the sane one.

  26. TheMostMom Says:

    KMorgan,
    Due to PEW finding this site, he can’t post truly current events. We all are saddened - yet slightly amused - at this. Welcome aboard the crazy train…

  27. Kate Says:

    Whenever I read “PEW” I hear it as “Pee-eww” in my head because I imagine she stinks in real life. Just gross.

    You are a class act “Jennifer” lol.

  28. Anonymous Says:

    Dear LM and DW,

    Many thanks for posting these transcripts.

    My partner’s phone conversations with his former wife were as head-spinningly irrational as yours; that is why we long ago turned to an email-only policy. (She despises this policy and has tried everything to get him to break it.)

    We have seen the child’s end of the child-mom calls (crying, confusion, distress), but haven’t heard the mom end. So it is helpful to “hear” what actually might be in those calls because we could never imagine something so insidious.

    Thanks.

  29. Optimist Says:

    When I first started reading your blog I thought how lucky my DH and I are that at least his ex didn’t do the conversational contortions that your PEW does. Then I reread some old e-mails (they almost never actually speak, it’s all e-mail). Now that I can read some of the old e-mails with less emotion than when then were fresh, I realized that she does do it. We were both just too caught in the emotion of the moment to realize that she would backtrack, change events, attribute her feelings to us and say that the children were lying if they said something that contradicted what she was trying to get. I’m going to try to use this new-found knowledge in future disputes. But the key - at least for me - is to not communicate when emotions are running high.

  30. Maria Says:

    No matter how many of these kinds of conversations I’ve heard myself, I still can’t get over them. The thought process (or lack thereof) of the PEW is consistently flabbergasting.

    My husband has two kids. In our family it’s D2 who is totally enmeshed. We have recorded conversations where our PEW is crying to her (8 years old at the time) and telling her how lonely she is without them there, and it’s just “so hard” for her when the kids are with thier dad because she’s “all alone here and the house is so quiet”. Think S2 wanted to go home immediately? Think she was able to enjoy anything after that? Think she wanted to call her mother 52 times a day to check on her, and got extremely upset if we didn’t let her? Oh yeah. And daddy was a horrible ogre for not allowing her to go take care of her mother.

    Gotta love it.

Leave a Reply




MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES