More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Parallel Parenting - How It Evolves & Implementation

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

Research on families of divorce suggest that there are primarily three styles of parenting for families after a divorce: cooperative, conflicted, or disengaged. Cooperative parenting (co-parenting) is the style used by families in which conflict is low and parents effectively communicate about their child. It is generally regarded as the most healthy outcome for the children and the parents. There is generally agreement on most parenting values, consistency in parenting styles, and debates/conflicts about the child(ren)’s lives are few.

In the aftermath of a divorce involving children, the parenting plan tends to move in the direction of co-parenting by default. The courts and all those who are a part of the divorce & custody machine love to see co-parenting and use that language often.

Unfortunately, the reason that families are in court in the first place is not because of their focus on cooperation and their ability to do so. Many a disagreement, even in intact households, have been about parenting styles. On parent doesn’t like the way the other handles a certain situation or situations. Personally, I’d like to see the language “parallel parenting” hit the mainstream due to this reality. Why do these conflicts continue during parenting in the aftermath of divorce?

  1. Continuation of hostility that began during the marriage
  2. Differing perceptions of pre-separation child-rearing roles
  3. Differing perceptions of post-separation child-rearing roles
  4. Differing perceptions of how to parent
  5. Concern about the adequacy of the other parent’s parenting ability
  6. An unwillingness of one or both parents to accept the end of the relationship
  7. Jealousy about a new partner in the other parent’s life
  8. Contested child custody issues
  9. Personality issues/factors in one or both parents that stimulate/escalate conflict

Whatever the reasons, the parents’ inability to separate their parental roles from prior conflict in the marriage is usually the most significant contributing factor post-divorce. This conflict is perhaps the most important variable in determining how your child adjusts to your divorce. Even if one parent does whatever it takes to reduce the amount of conflict in the aftermath of divorce - the benefits to the child are significant.

The first step towards minimizing the conflict post-divorce is learning to disengage from the other parent. Disengagement is one of the possible styles of parenting after divorce. If you disengage, you create a no-conflict zone around the children and have limited contact with the other parent. With disengagement, you avoid contact with the other parent so that conflict cannot develop. Disengagement is a necessary first-step to reduce the conflict before you can move on to the next style of parenting… parallel parenting.

There are significant differences between co-parenting and parallel parenting. Simply put: Cooperative Parenting vs. Independent Parenting. It’s really that simple and that difficult all at the same time. The name is derived from a similar concept in children’s play. Research psychologists have observed that young children who play together, but do not have the skills to interact cooperatively, engage in a process of parallel play. If they are in a sandbox together or taking turns going down a slide, they play next to one another, not with one another. Each child is doing her own thing with the toys, and generally ignoring the other. When they get older, they will learn to interact cooperatively and play together.

Co-Parenting VERSUS Parallel Parenting

  1. Child Focused /// Adult Focused.
  2. Parents communicate regularly /// Parents communicate only during emergencies or matters of an urgent nature relating to the children.
  3. Parents can communicate in person/via phone /// Parents communicate in writing (email, text, etc) or via a third-party (NOT the children).
  4. Major decisions are jointly discussed /// Major decisions are communicated rather than discussed (unless prohibited by a court order).
  5. Parents work together as needed to resolve issues related to the child /// Households resolve day-to-day issues independently of one another. Each parent makes decisions about the child when s/he is in their household.
  6. Parents work together with the best interests of the child in mind /// Parents work separately with the best interests of the child in mind (as they perceive them).
  7. Smooth transitions from one home to the other /// Transitions may involve substantial change for the child(ren) and exchanges may be done at a neutral location.
  8. Schedule is flexible and changes are negotiable /// Schedule is inflexible, few/no changes are made, a court-order typically dictates the exact schedule and deviations are rare. Parents need third-party direction.
  9. Parents can discuss issues between child(ren) and the other parent, cooperative discipline, extracurriculars scheduling, etc. /// Parents individually responsible for own relationship with the child and direct any issues between child and other parent back to them. Nothing is planned or discussed that would impact on the other’s parenting time.

Under such an agreement, the parents establish two separate and distinct households. Each parent is responsible for providing for the children their own sets of clothes, copies of important documentation (birth certificates, doctor & dental reports, immunization records, social security cards, insurance cards, etc.), shoes, hats, coats, school supplies… you get the picture! Contact should in written form and limited to short, factual information. (See my low-contact article for tips). Whenever possible, the transition should be made as third-party. A time frame in established, for example, father will drop child(ren) off at school in the morning and mother will retrieve the child from school at the end of the day. In this type of arrangement, there is a time buffer and that allows for a safe, healthy, no-conflict transition.

Where very young children are involved, it is important to share all aspects of your child’s functions with the daycare provider when you do the drop-off. Using the same philosophy, it is of paramount importance for parents to share detailed information with each other upon the exchange of the child. A useful tool is a “parent communication notebook.” In this notebook you will write down the highlights of your child’s emotions, behaviors, important health information, important school information, etc. during the time the child(ren) are with you. Complete the notebook in detail and pass it along to the other parent at the time of transition. I strongly recommend that you create the pages electronically. It is not uncommon for these communications to remain “one-way” and you don’t want your hard work to vanish into thin air without a back-up. Don’t let the other parent’s lack of cooperation with the notebook stop you from continuing to perform this vitally important function. This notebook should stay with your child so each parent can use it as a forum for preserving thoughts about your child and their needs. Always remember the focus is on the children. You should include no opinions about the other parent and conversely, ignore any “editorial” comments that are made by the other parent.

It is my experience and the experiences of many folks whose stories I have read that a person suffering from or suspected of having borderline personality disorder will challenge any boundary established by their target(s). The efforts you undertake in moving towards a parallel parenting plan and establishing boundaries and low-contact methods - eliminates much of the frustration that exists as you struggle to parent/step-parent with a high-conflict ex-spouse (BPD or otherwise). A firm, documented set of rules provides the structure by which you can minimize the conflict in the aftermath of a divorce with a difficult personality. It will not eliminate the issues, but will dramatically reduce them when you become disciplined enough to maintain them. Remember, you cannot control the other person - only how you react to them. It takes practice and you WILL be challenged.

Ten Tips for Successful Parallel Parenting

  1. Maintain an attitude for non-interference with your child’s other parent. Neither parent has influence or say over the actions of the other parent.
  2. Carry on a business-like attitude; use common courtesy.
  3. Do not plan activities for the children during the other parent’s time. It may be better for a child to miss an event than to witness conflict.
  4. Stay focused on the present.
  5. Stay oriented to the task at hand.
  6. Keep your children’s best interests in mind.
  7. Remember the goal is to keep conflict to a minimum.
  8. Follow up in writing all agreements and discussions regarding the children, and do so succinctly!
  9. When communication and/or negotiation is necessary, use a neutral third party to assist you.
  10. Keep an open mind.

Even under the best of circumstances (whatever that means), parenting is challenging. Adding on factors related to divorce makes parenting even more challenging. Although it is useful for parenting plans in divorce agreements to be comprehensive and specific, it is virtually impossible for every detail to be addressed in a document. But that’s actually a good thing. Why? Because children benefit as their divorced parents develop the ability to manage the details of parenting without conflict.

Do you really want to go to court and have a judge make decisions about your child? You know and love your child. So does your child’s other parent. If the two of you have nothing else in common, you will always have your child in common. You may need help to develop practical, efficient techniques to communicate and make decisions, manage scheduling, set boundaries and clarify expectations.

Resources for information about parenting styles and sources for some of the content of this article include:

Parellel Parenting - A Form of Joint Custody

What is this about Parallel Parenting?

Cooperative or Parallel Parenting

Is Parallel Parenting Back?

Coparenting Summary

Parenting Coordination - Implementation Issues

12 Responses to “Parallel Parenting - How It Evolves & Implementation”

  1. vamomma Says:

    Your post asks rhetorically, “Do you really want to go to court and have a judge make decisions about your child?”

    With my ex, and with other ex’s with mental illness, I do believe the answer is yes.

  2. JB Says:

    I have to agree with vamomma: high-conflict people, especially those with borderline personality disorder or narcissistic personality disorder frequently fantasize about their grand moment when an authority figure (the judge) publicly validates them and their emotions, punishes the other party with sweeping, harsh punitive measures, and generously hands them everything to which they believe they are entitled. In their twisted minds, that is the only possible outcome from the judge, and they long for the day when it can finally happen for them.

    That rhetorical question comes from the mind of someone who is actually *sane*, and assumes that the other party will approach life from an equally sane state. That’s the error that non-personality-disordered people make with the personality-disordered people in their lives over and over.

    P.S. Thanks LM, for those links, too. Great research!!

  3. cassee01 Says:

    I think one of the most ironic things about divorce is the fact that they (meaning the court system/gov’d/etc) want co-operative parenting from two people who obviously can’t get along, which is why they are getting divorced! If they can’t stay married how in the hell can you expect them to co-parent. I know, the whole, think of the children thing, well if they can’t do that married, how can they do it divorced? It’s just makes no sense to me. Maybe if we were living in Utopia where everyone is considerate and nice and fair, but we don’t, we live in reality where people have to overcome those selfish thoughts, which many can’t.

  4. Mister-M Says:

    I agree with VAMOMMA, too! I also know, particularly from VAMOMMA’s situation (among others) - that the real answer is “not really.”

    When you go to court, you never know what the outcome is going to be, now do you?

    While there are definitely cases where you would love for the court to make a decision - most people say that, as JB illustrated, from the “sane” point of view… something that family court all too often is NOT.

    VAMOMMA - you’ve been to court and had your judge make some decisions. Hindsight being what it is… if your answer was truly “yes” - you’d have a court date looming. But the outcome isn’t a foregone conclusion now, is it?

  5. vamomma Says:

    Oops…hate to be a pain…and I’m just heading out to the doctor. I just thought about your comment and then thought–I gave the wrong answer.

    Do you mean that if his answer was yes, we’d have a court date?

    I answered wrong then.

    His answer will always be yes. He will always want to go to court…mostly because he hopes to punish me. It’s not about the kids or deciding what’s best for their lives. It never has or will be.

    But, several things happened which is why I believe we haven’t had a court date for a while…firstly, he lost his job and his lawyer ditched him. Yeah unemployment.

    Sister/wifie put a stop of the money drain–she was paying his bills.

    The judge–from what I got from my lawyer–has made it be known that he’s HAD it with all of this crap. And reamed him out after the last court episode. This when I called for info on a retainer fee–my lawyer was very reluctant to go back to court for a bunch of reasons.

    As always with court and mentally ill ex spouses, the answer is never just yes or no…

  6. Maria Says:

    I have to agree also with vamomma - even though our court experience was nothing less than a surreal / alternate reality experience that made no logical sense what-so-ever.

    Even though my husband did not get custody, things have gotten better since “a judge decided for us”. My feeling is that it’s because there are clear boundaries (exact dates and even times for exchanges) and little room for ambiguity - which means less room for manipulation on the part of his BPD ex-wife.

    In my opinion, parallel parenting is impossible unless all of the details have been laid out - and because you can’t negotiate with someone who has BPD - those details end up be decided by a judge.

    Did we get exactly what we wanted? No, we didn’t. But, what we did get was a substantial decrease in the amount of phone calls/ e-mails/ text messages from the ex. I don’t see any other way that would have been possible, except for the judge deciding for them.

  7. Tasego Says:

    I just had to let you know that not all court systems like co-parenting. In my experience with my ex, when we went to court, the judge and the “experts” at the Court Clinic did not agree with the parenting plan that we both agreed to, and made us change it so that my son did not have as much time with his father. They said that my son was too young for our time-sharing plan, even though that is what we had been doing for the past year (we were told that we had to get it official in court for child support reasons.) We thought that the judge and the “experts” would be singing our praises for being able to work things out and get along for the sake of our child. We were severly dissapointed. We just ignored what the court order said and did what we knew was best for our son… as far as the child support went, we decided to go with the calculated amount and put the extra in a savings account for our son.
    It made us think that the court system relies on high conflict cases so that the judges and court staff have job security.

  8. Mister-M Says:

    tasego,

    I’m not surprised at all by what you have shared here. What they did was criminal and yes… as you described… in the state’s best interests and no one else’s.

    It’s a great story to see how you and your ex were able to work together, despite the ILLEGAL constraints of the family court, and make it work out for everyone.

    I applaud you!

  9. Another Mama Says:

    I love what you wrote. So true and refreshing.

    We don’t want to co-parent with her. It is almost impossible. It’s simple-We don’t meet her expectations. Whether it be our decisions… when we talk to her about them….how we talk to her about them etc….and then she gets upset.
    We have to disengage for the kids sake.
    This parallel parenting is definately the way to go.

    AM

  10. Amy Says:

    With a very heavy heart I concede. I have tried for many years to build a positive cooperative parent relationship, but my building looks like the leaning tower:) We can only do our part, what the other side chooses to do we have no control over. I still believe that cooperative parenting is the best route, but for now I give up. They win this battle. Hopefully some day there won’t need to be a battle to win and we can all play our role as parents with cooperation and respect, but until then I concede.

    Amy

  11. Differing Approaches to Discipline | The Psycho Ex Wife Says:

    [...] that the Psycho Ex-Wife and I take in addressing them.  This is actually the tough part of parallel parenting.  Why is it tough?  Some situations merit both parents attention regardless of on whose watch the [...]

  12. nocomment Says:

    Hi

    I have read some of your blog. Interesting that there are so many out there with similar stories. My ex calls me psycho and such. I am the one that was considered the “sane” one though when it came to the custody assessment and I won custody. I have a parallel parenting plan with me having final say over every issue. Even though he tries to pull me into fights I have learned not to respond. These types can not fight air. They try I know but think of how others perceive the both of you (teachers, doctors, neighbours etc.) I f you apologise for your ex and don’t give your side. THEY GET IT. You are sane, they are not.
    I want to bring it up that people with BPD or other personality disorders usually marry people with complimentary mental issues.They usually never end up with “normal” partners. That is what makes it so tragic.
    The only piece of advice I can share with all is detach yourself from them and stop letting them pull you back into the past. MOVE ON. BE HAPP. TRULY WISH THEM HAPPINESS and GET ON WITH LIVING YOUR NEW LIFE. If you want to help your kids I whole heartedly suggest reading a book by Judith Wallerstein so you can learn how this is impacting your children. Move past them and don’t respond. They will stop eventually.

    Good luck to all

Leave a Reply




MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES