More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Archive: projection

The Beauty of Hindsight

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

Folks, this is a really long one.  If you think you’re going to try to do this all in one sitting, better wrap yourself in a Snuggie and have a nice, strong drink at the ready.

Go on, take your time… I’ll wait…

-

-

-

(This is me, waiting…)

-

-

-

We often fail to realize “things” when we’re right in the thick of it.  Thus, comes the beauty of hindsight.  You see, PEWs like mine never learn from the past and therefore are always doomed to repeat it.  I annoyingly speak of projection when it comes to PEW, but it simply cannot be helped.  One of the unfortunate by-products of my long layoff in 2007 and my long layoff last year is the dreaded trips to the courthouse for the waste-of-time conferences followed by the inevitable hearings.  Child support has to be adjusted one way or the other (and sometimes not) and this gives PEW the opportunity for PEW to recycle her old tricks, like her magical math that grossly over-inflates child care expenses and health care expenses and whatever else it is she can fabricate in an effort to maximize the child support number.  It’s especially nice for her when her fictional figures get rolled into the equation by the courts, because when she doesn’t actually incur those expenses, that’s cash-money directly into her pocket.

Dateline, early 2006. As discussed in general many times in the past, I had grown tired of being “ripped off” by PEW’s magical math.  I also had grown tired of “taking the (bullshit) high road” and simply sacrificing substantial credits due me when things were to be righted, just to avoid going to court.  While I wasn’t particularly smart and certainly not in low-contact mode, I was definitely trying to rattle the cage by calling her on her fuzzy math, even when it was just blowing smoke to expose her lies.

It was tax time and I was foolishly relying on PEW for some information I needed to do taxes.  I requested the tax ID numbers of the school, the church (for S2’s pre-k), and the babysitter she reportedly was paying $165/week to watch S2 for three half-days per week.  This was not good for either PEW or “Janice” because I was blustering about claiming my percentage of childcare costs that were part of the CS figure.

PEW wasn’t giving it, not only because she flat-out didn’t pay Janice what she had told the court, but Janice would also have to report the amount PEW told the court, every single week, as income… did I mention every single week for the school year?  Looks like this was a serious catch-22.  While ultimately I let it drop, her lies to compound her lies might make for great reading.  At the same time, you can have a chuckle about how ridiculous high-contact continued to make me look.  We’ll pick it up after the initial requests and back-and-forth…  I had called her on the figures she gave to the court and she replied:

(more…)

Asking the Psycho Ex-Wife to Facilitate Phone Contact with the Children

Disruptive phone contact and phone call interference is something I’ve written about extensively on the blog.  It is also one of the most common issues facing those who follow the blog, whether they’re checking back regularly or simply passing-through.

In the early days, given my non-custodial parent status, frequent and substantive phone calls with the children were extremely important to me.  Not that they still aren’t, but my approach has changed dramatically over the years given what I am actually able to manage about the situation.  Back then, it would seem I was stone-walled at every turn.  There are several common tactics that the vindictive, psycho ex-wife or psycho ex-husband employ when it comes to phone contact.

  • Not answering the phone at all.
  • Not returning calls when messages are left.
  • Hovering over the children during phone calls to “listen-in” or tell the child what to say.
  • Forcing the children off of the phone abruptly.
  • Interrupting the phone calls to speak to the children while they’re on the phone.
  • Having the television on, loudly, to the kids’ favorite television show or movie.
  • Seeking to engage the normal parent (usually in front of the children) prior to allowing the children to have the phone.

Later in the fall of 2005, well after the recorded events of the summer had come and long gone, I still was having significant problems when it came to calling the children.  Despite these ongoing problems, I always made sure that the television was off and the children had a reasonable level of privacy when they were with me and PEW called, save for the period where I was recording the phone calls with PEW’s permission.  I tried to get some reciprocation through another failed email effort. I did what I could, by calling at around their normal bedtime so that I didn’t interfere with expected activities that would likely be taking place earlier in the day. I rather enjoyed using that as tuck-in time given the distance.

PEW,

Phone calls - I don’t know which way would be easiest, but I’d like to come up with some sort of idea for when I call the boys. I know S2 can be ornery when it comes to phone conversations and we’ll just have to make due. But I have asked before to have them set-up someway/somehow where they will be “less distracted” when I call to chat with them but it still happens. It’s tough to have a conversation with them when they have one eye on the TV or they are involved in something. I don’t know if you can have them go to their room for a short chat when I call or if it would be easier for you to have them call me when they are set-up at some point when they are ready to settle down for the evening - but it would be helpful if you could assist me with this. I’m not sure what else to suggest.

Let me know what you think.

~LM

For those who follow the low-contact principles that I beg of you to maintain, the comment “let me know what you think” isn’t one of those things you should be doing. Nothing invites an escalation more… than an invitation such as this. Make requests without inviting feedback. Chances are you know it will be denial and/or refusal. Asking them to send it back to you is silly. Truth be told - when you’re dealing with the high-conflict ex, you probably are best served not making the suggestions at all.

LM,

As far as the phone calls, I try my best to make sure there are minimal distractions when you call. As you know, by the time I get home with them it is approximately 5:45, this gives me about 2 hours to do dinner, homework, baths, spend some quality time with them, etc, etc… Two hours is not a lot of time and I have many additional responsibilities besides your phone call, not that the phone call isn’t important because it is very important. Here are my thoughts, I will do my best on my end, but you are going to have to do your best to get them to attend to the conversation, however you can. Please stop harrassing me about this. They don’t always want to talk to me when I call them at your house and guess what, I understand. The most important thing that you need to realize is that the conversations are for them, not for you. When they need to talk to their daddy, they spend extra time talking to you, don’t they? I’ve heard S1 and S2 have prolonged conversations with you on nights when they really wanted to talk to you whether there was a toy in the room or not. I’m glad you want to talk to them, but it’s not my job to MAKE them talk if they don’t want to.

~PEW

Well, at no time did I ask her to “make them” talk to me. Yes, on the rare occasions when they weren’t distracted by other goings on, we did have conversations that one wouldn’t expect with children so young. That will happen when you ask them to tell you about their day and details about the things they were enjoying having done. However, by calling at bedtime, I made the effort not to interfere with her meaningful time and did so under the assumption that television, movies, video games, etc. would long be finished. Oh, and a single email about this doesn’t constitute “harassment.”

PEW,

I didn’t ask you to “make” them talk to me. I simply asked you to assist in minimizing distractions whenever possible. They will talk as long as they wish. What is tough to overcome is:

  • They don’t talk because they are watching the show that is on TV.
  • They hurry me off the phone because you told them that you are putting a movie in for them.
  • They want to hang up because you have some other activity going on.

I call at around 8PM guessing that things may be settling down, perhaps they are getting ready for bed or similar in an effort NOT to interfere with your time.

My intent is not to “harass” you about it. My intent is to get the minimum amount of cooperation from you on matters relevant to the children and my interaction with them. It is asking no more than what I ensure for you when it is time for them to talk to you. I wouldn’t be asking again if I didn’t feel the need to based upon my experiences.

Thanks.

~LM

Continued reasoning in 2005 is the result of years of doing the same thing over and over and over and over again and expecting a different outcome. I guess I was insane by that point, probably long before.

LM,

It’s not quite like that. I always turn the TV off when they are talking to you, but it just so happened that I was doing something important the other night when you called and I couldn’t stand over them and make sure they listened to you. I do minimize the distractions.

I never tell them “let’s rush off the phone with Daddy so I can put a movie in for you”. They ask me if they can watch a movie and I say “let’s call Daddy first so you can talk to him, then I’ll put the movie in when you’re done talking”

I would have them call when they are IN bed, but then you’d be harrassing me that it was after 8 o’clock.

Your harrassment of me for every little thing has got to stop. Major issues you have with me, yes, I absolutely want to hear about, but I feel like you go out of your way to invent things to complain about when it comes to me. You have nothing else right now, so I gotta hear about the phone calls, right?

~PEW

Some lies and some excuse-making. Fact is, she NEVER turned the television or video game system off when I called. When I say “never,” I mean “NEVER.” Never. Not a single time at that point. You have to laugh at her explanation of the movie thing. She didn’t have to say “let’s rush off the phone” to get to a movie. It’s implied that the faster that they get off the phone with me, the faster that they can get to their movie. That’s a good enough defense for her. Oh, and let me be clear that at no time has she ever initiated a phone call to me from the children unless it was a call-back. Not a single time since we split until 2004. Every rare once-in-a-while, the children may ask her to call me and they do. Even those moments are rare and to be expected. For the most part, that comment by her is almost completely false, too.

It seems from the next email I sent that we must have had a phone discussion the night before. It would seem from what I say that the matter was agreed and settled. So, I seem confounded by the reply above.

PEW,

I made a simple request. I did not and do not harass you. Fact is, I reasonably discussed my concerns last night, despite your obvious sarcasm. Confounding is that you would continue today after we discussed this last night. I thought the matter was addressed and settled - you communicated that doing what you can to keep the boys from being distracted when I speak to them was not important to you. I explained why it is important to me and why it should be to you. You don’t care. I guess that’s the end of the story.

~LM

I didn’t say it was settled to my satisfaction, just that she made her position clear and there was nothing more I was going to be able to do about it.

LM,

I do care and the phone calls are important to me. If you stopped calling or caring, I would certainly have two very unhappy little boys. They need their Dad, I know that and I have always known that. I answered your email, I wasn’t continuing anything. What I said was that I try my best and sometimes I will fail because things come up that require my immediate attention.

You really need to stop portraying yourself as some sort of victim. I do my best under the circumstances, but you’re just never happy.

~PEW

Like what? What comes up at 8PM, the children’s bedtime, that requires your “immediate attention” that you can’t turn the television off or send them into the dining room or their bedroom to have some quiet discussion with their father? Answer: Nothing.

As with most things involving a psycho-ex - it’s all about power and control.

Another Commonality: More Therapist Shenanigans

Next week, we’ll move straight to the 2nd custody evaluation and subsequent hearing, perhaps with more mindless bantering back-and-forth over bullshit as we were prone to do back in the “good ‘ole days.”

We were engaged in discussions (summer 2005) about continuing therapy for the boys as they struggled to make sense of the mess that was now their “family.” It was an issue from even the earliest days of our split, where we made some early counseling efforts for the children.  Given the distance between us, I had given this some thought as well and was hoping to have someone available should the boys want to see someone when they were with me. Of course, in the classic “double-bind” mode that is so common among borderlines, “what’s good for the PEW is never good for the gander.” As was often the case, it rolled into email.

This is one of those “commonalities” that those of us who deal with a PEW or a PEH experience. They all do the dentist/orthodontist/braces routine. They all do the “therapist shopping for the children” routine. They lawyer shop. They try to judge shop. They do the private school routine. They ALL do it. Yes, ALL. I speak now in absolutes, something I normally despise.

Email Dance-Off #1:

LM:

They should have someone here to speak to, as well, when a need arises. Are we going to encounter another situation where the agreement can only be reached when it is an agreement solely on your terms? I have no problem with them seeing a therapist in [custody state] and would have a really tough time understanding why you would object to them having someone available here as well. In fact, I believe that there is probably no reason why any chosen therapists couldn’t maintain contact with one another so that everyone was all on the same page. Frankly, your attorney isn’t qualified to make the call on what is appropriate for therapy. Where their current “primary” residence is should have no bearing on making counseling available to our children.

Some lawyers know no boundaries, and this assumes that he was even involved in any such discussions.  It’s all about the “best interests of the children” - well, until a well-oiled high-conflict ex can be soaked for more billable hours.

PEW:

Are the kids having issues right now that you feel they need therapy down there? That would be a different story and you would need to explain your reasoning to me. I gave you that courtesy every time I wanted to get therapy for them, didn’t I? As far as [my attorney] being qualified, I believe the fact that he has been practicing family law for 15 years makes him more qualified than you to determine if therapy in [home state] is appropriate.

Is it me or is this just a silly question?  If there are any issues that necessitate therapy when they are with mom, do they simply vanish when they are with dad?  Of course, there is the added input of a family law attorney, whose credentials apparently give him the knowledge and authority to make a case for or against family counseling for children.

LM:

[Dave] is [Nanny Suzie's] fiancee. He has no involvement in the childcare. He is not “often” with them.

As for your repeated questions about Suzie’s background, this will make the third time I’ve answered your questions about this. DW found her through an advertisement almost 3 years ago and has served as her nanny since then. Suzie has worked in childcare in some capacity since she was 12-years old. She has been a nanny for approximately 6-years. Prior to that, she was a teaching assistant at [Local] Elementary School. I believe she’s had a criminal background check, though I couldn’t tell you how recently.

Wall… meet head.  Commence banging…

(more…)

When Child Care Expenses Aren’t Mom’s Responsibility: The Nanny

2005 would be the first of a couple of summers where PEW would escape paying her portion of childcare expenses when the children were with me.  Of course, there are those psycho biological mothers who believe expenses and child support should only be paid by a father.  Despite the crazy, mixed-up statutes that have afforded such women those beliefs, it’s not true.  That doesn’t mean that some don’t get their beliefs validated, either by financial attrition (dad realizes it will cost more to make her pay in legal fees than she owes for her RESPONSIBILITY), or by a judge’s “discretion.”

I approach her via email with the forthcoming issue regarding childcare during my custodial time:

PEW,

Obviously, pending the forthcoming expected report and court hearing, I was wondering how we are going to handle the child-care expenses situation? I have a couple of weeks where I will have to pay for childcare in addition to the fact that you won’t before our expected court date arrives. I was wondering how you wanted to handle it?

Please advise.

As if I had any belief that she would want to handle it any other way than “you pay for your own childcare, and you pay in proportion to our incomes for when I need childcare.”

LM,

How do you figure? According to you, you have vacation the last week in June. And then again the 2nd week in July. As I said, I’m not giving you the time until the judge makes it an order because I don’t agree with it. Additionally, I will be paying additional child care while their with me and either at camp or with a sitter (child care that is not included in the current support order.) Additionally you’ve paid nothing towards S2s $1500 tuition from last year, so I doubt I’ll be owing you any money, it’s much more likely it will be the other way around. If you feel differently, you can ask your lawyer to file for a modification and I’ll take that opportunity to get reimbursed for my out of pocket child care.

As of right now, you’ll have the kids the last week in June and the 2nd week in July.

Nuts.  Absolutely nuts.

First, our hearing wasn’t scheduled until July 20th, half-way through the summer.  Convenient for her that she would wait until the judge’s order on July 20th before “giving me” the time to which I was entitled between June 16th and July 20th.  She’s fucking brilliant.

Second, again she brings up the pre-K tuition which she was told, in an order from a Judge, was not necessary but optional.  She was stay-at-home during the week and was not in “need” of childcare.  If she wanted to enroll him, it was okay but I certainly wasn’t going to foot the bill for it.

PEW,

Thanks.

I didn’t know what else to say.  I should have said nothing, but then I have a long and storied history of not realizing that saying nothing would be the best thing to say.

LM,

and you claim “it’s not about money”…..you kill me.

And that quickly, she has me hooked again!

(more…)

The Inevitable Discovery of ThePsychoExWife.Com

We’ve occasionally discussed what we thought might happen should the website be discovered.  We’re pretty sure that any number of things might occur and we’re pretty convinced that none of them would be particularly good.

We often speculate what might occur…

  • PEW would call CPS (again).
  • Maybe get her dumbass father to leave us a nice voice-mail again so he can say things like “whore” and “slut” and be all tough-guy on our asses.
  • PEW would call her normal brothers and see if they would beat me up on her behalf (despite them knowing how absolutely off-the-chain both PEW and Psycho-SIL are).
  • Threaten court (again).
  • She would project all of her self-hatred outward onto me (again).
  • She’ll definitely “tell my dad” on me.  My dad, not her dad.
  • She’ll tell others in my family.
  • Maybe she might send an email, that might look like this:

LM,

I have decided that tomorrow I am sending a letter to [CSE] asking them to terminate your child support payments to me. Then I am taking the entire contents of your www.thepsychoexwife.com website to court with me….I’m asking for an emergency hearing…because you have lost it. The whole scary thing is printed out, particularly the part where DW says she hates our kids…and they have social and behavioral problems…someday if they choose to be like me “they will have to go their own way”? I’m scared….this is scary…I’ve read it all and with every new article, it just got scarier. You are a scary scary individual….and DW is JUST as scary. You do not have to pay for the braces…..I did not realize how sick you actually were. I will pay for the braces by myself. I’m going to consult with a child psychologist and find out if the kids should know about this, because I can tell you…despite what they tell you, they are very loving and affectionate to me and I am to them as well….I’m thinking you and ugly have a big HATE expedition going on over there….it’s not healthy….and it’s weird since I granted you without a fight 50/50 custody…gave you a huge break on child support….I don’t even know who you’re talking about on that website, but it aint ME. Please don’t kill me….because as I was reading it that’s all I was thinking, you’re nuts. Keep your money…make love to it, wallpaper with it….make a loin cloth out of it….use it for psychotherapy (highly recommended) just stay the fuck away from me.

This is the last email you will ever receive from me.

you’re sick…. PEW

Well… that’s what I imagine it would look like if just such a discovery were to occur.  And if just such an email would actually be the result, I might be inclined to have the following thoughts based upon quotes from just such an email:

(more…)




MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES