The Beauty of Hindsight
Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.
Folks, this is a really long one. If you think you’re going to try to do this all in one sitting, better wrap yourself in a Snuggie and have a nice, strong drink at the ready.
Go on, take your time… I’ll wait…
-
-
-
(This is me, waiting…)
-
-
-
We often fail to realize “things” when we’re right in the thick of it. Thus, comes the beauty of hindsight. You see, PEWs like mine never learn from the past and therefore are always doomed to repeat it. I annoyingly speak of projection when it comes to PEW, but it simply cannot be helped. One of the unfortunate by-products of my long layoff in 2007 and my long layoff last year is the dreaded trips to the courthouse for the waste-of-time conferences followed by the inevitable hearings. Child support has to be adjusted one way or the other (and sometimes not) and this gives PEW the opportunity for PEW to recycle her old tricks, like her magical math that grossly over-inflates child care expenses and health care expenses and whatever else it is she can fabricate in an effort to maximize the child support number. It’s especially nice for her when her fictional figures get rolled into the equation by the courts, because when she doesn’t actually incur those expenses, that’s cash-money directly into her pocket.
Dateline, early 2006. As discussed in general many times in the past, I had grown tired of being “ripped off” by PEW’s magical math. I also had grown tired of “taking the (bullshit) high road” and simply sacrificing substantial credits due me when things were to be righted, just to avoid going to court. While I wasn’t particularly smart and certainly not in low-contact mode, I was definitely trying to rattle the cage by calling her on her fuzzy math, even when it was just blowing smoke to expose her lies.
It was tax time and I was foolishly relying on PEW for some information I needed to do taxes. I requested the tax ID numbers of the school, the church (for S2’s pre-k), and the babysitter she reportedly was paying $165/week to watch S2 for three half-days per week. This was not good for either PEW or “Janice” because I was blustering about claiming my percentage of childcare costs that were part of the CS figure.
PEW wasn’t giving it, not only because she flat-out didn’t pay Janice what she had told the court, but Janice would also have to report the amount PEW told the court, every single week, as income… did I mention every single week for the school year? Looks like this was a serious catch-22. While ultimately I let it drop, her lies to compound her lies might make for great reading. At the same time, you can have a chuckle about how ridiculous high-contact continued to make me look. We’ll pick it up after the initial requests and back-and-forth… I had called her on the figures she gave to the court and she replied:


