More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Archive: divorce

Teenagers, Children, and Step-Family Experiences

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

A few weeks ago, the Today Show on NBC had a segment called “Teens and Step-Families” which featured a panel of a couple of “experts” and a group of teens from around the country to share their experiences.

On their parents dating:

Only 1 of the 10 had an issue with their parent dating.  One young lady was upset that her father started dating after her mother died.  He began to see someone a little more than a year after his wife’s death.  She went on to say that eventually she realized that she needed to be more mature and understanding about the situation, even though at 12, that can be a pretty lofty expectation.  We would imagine that going through what are almost always difficult teen years, between hormones, relationship developments with peers, schooling, pending adulthood - the introduction of a new adult figure in your life, especially given the mother was deceased, can only add to that angst.

On the new adult taking on a parental role:

The teens were asked about how forcefully or quickly the new parental-figure in their lives tried to establish a parental-role in the household.  One young-man said that in his mother’s case (step-father), the man did try to establish his authority over the children and that sometimes caused issues between mom and step-dad as well as between the kids and step-dad.  Interestingly, it was because they (the kids) “didn’t always agree” with the sanctions.  I’m not sure I know too many kids who agree with any discipline no matter who it comes from.

On the strangeness or weirdness of seeing your parent being affectionate with a new partner:

One young man spoke about how his biological parents were typically openly affectionate with one another and that his advice to people in similar situations was to “get over it.”  He went on to say that parents are entitled to be affectionate with their new partners and to express love and good feelings for one another.  It has to be expected and accepted.

Still another young lady made some very salient points about the experiences and feelings of the children.  She said that one of the things that she struggled with was the conflict about her feelings of fairness with regard to her mother carrying on her life and her own feelings of loss and disappointment at the broken family.

Paraphrasing:

We may disregard our own feelings about certain situations we experience because we know that our parents are entitled to carry on with their own lives.  We know that they are allowed to spend the rest of their lives with someone if that’s what they choose to do.  Still, it conflicts with our own feelings about how disappointed we are that our parents didn’t stay together in the first place.  We sacrifice our own feelings for the sake of our parent’s feelings.

The kids want to assure their parents that everything is “just fine” even though everything may not be.  So, it would appear that in addition to the struggles that children sometimes find themselves in when their biological parents split (blaming themselves somehow for the break-up), they find themselves with some sort of emotional whiplash in trying to avoid any appearance of being the cause for upset in their new relationship.

On the subject of the addition of new family members (half-siblings):

I was pleasantly surprised to see that none of the 10 teen panelists felt “left out” or like the “odd person out” when children were born of the new relationship.  Clearly, 10 people don’t represent a cross-section of all of the children in step-situations, so I think it’s safe to assume that there may be some level of awkwardness that would hopefully wane over time.

The discipline issue:

Several struggled with the issue of discipline as it came from the new step-parent.  One young man told of being very apprehensive and defiant in the face of discipline that came from his step-mother.  However, he said that with the backing of his father, it wasn’t long before he learned that he needed to listen.  He was often faced with his father telling him in every situation that the approach that step-mom took in each scenario was appropriate and that she was correct and knew what she was doing.  The teen went on to say that it became difficult to be defiant when your biological parent was there reinforcing that what step-mom was undertaking was appropriate in his eyes, too.  “Over the years, it became much more easy to listen to her.”

Another young man spoke of being a “momma’s boy” and being protective of his mother, so when she brought someone new home, he would do everything in his power to act mean and obnoxious and try to run the new guy off!  He continued to explain that as he looks back on it now that he is older, he realizes that he needed to be much more mature in his treatment of others and that communication is essential to make that happen.  He was referring to the child communicating more and more effectively with the parent, stating that if you are more open and communicative with your parent about how you’re feeling (and why) - everyone can work together to create more harmony and less upset.

Only one of the teens expressed never really connecting with her step-mother, primarily because she “wasn’t a very good listener” when she tried to express herself.

On the subject of existing new family members (step-siblings):

Several indicated that the step-parent showed “favoritism” towards their own children versus the step-children.  Explanations seemed to show that “favoritism” was not necessarily the best term to use.  One teen, however, looks back and surmises that the step-parent is probably concerned with the appearance of trying to “take over” for the biological parent.  As result, there was an understanding of the different levels of affection/attention shown towards the biological children versus the step-children.  They have a better understanding as older teens at the struggles that all step-parents face.

Dr. Janet Taylor - a psychiatrist - supported the assertions of the teen panel by reinforcing that communication is essential to a successful transition, even if it’s not the easiest thing to accomplish.  Setting boundaries and being clear about expectations won’t happen by default.  Further, if the step-parent and biological parent are on the same page and convey similar messages, the transition can expect to be the smoothest.

Gary Neuman - family counselor and author - focused on the integration of step-parents into a teen child’s life.  Given the changes and relationship development that is happening in the teen’ s life and social circles, the addition of a new parental figure can be especially stressful.  Gary pointed out something I think may sometimes be overlooked and that is, becoming a family “takes time.”  One can’t just appear and expect to be the perfect parent overnight, even if they are a perfect parent! The child(ren)’s personality has developed as the result of another half of the parental partnership over a long period of time.  The best step-parent/step-child relationships are likely to develop slowly, over time.

Time and again the common theme became of one of clear communication and consistent boundaries.  A parent or step-parent can neither be affectionate nor disciplinarian without being able to share care and compassion.  Dr. Taylor went a step further when it came to a discussion regarding affection and discipline, particularly discipline.

Paraphrased:

As a step-parent, if you step in and say that I’m not part of that family or that issue and let the mother or father deal with that issue, the dynamic that you’re setting up over the long haul is dangerous.

It’s a marital issue and it’s a communication issue and both the biological parent and step-parent have to have a complete understanding about how these issues can play out.  If this is not clear throughout the entire family, the step-parent will neither have the respect nor the authority that is warranted in a normal functioning household.

What should be done when a step-child is simply not treating the step-parent well at all?

The family counselor stated that the biological parent must step-up and convey to the children that they must have respect and cordiality towards the step-parent.  It is not optional.  It is an expectation.  The love and family feeling will develop with a meaningful effort on all parties, including the children.

The psychiatrist also added to keep in mind, particularly with teens, that it is the teenager’s nature to “push back” and it’s rather likely that the step-parent is getting no more animosity in certain situations than a biological parent might expect to see.  She stressed it’s important to avoid taking this personally.  Have a broader view of what is taking place and avoid blaming it solely on the fact that you’re not the child’s biological parent.  There may be bigger issues at work here.

Some of the teens chimed in that for them, it was/is essential that the step-parent communicate early and often that you are all part of the “same team.”  You all love the biological parent and that can be a common thread on which to build a relationship.  It is not and will not ever be a competition between biological parents and step-parents.  We’re all just trying to get along the best way we know how with the resources we have available to do that.  It’s easiest to make a better life for all if all are doing the best they can towards that end.

All-in-all it was a well produced segment that managed to hit on most of the important issues as best as possible for what amounted to a 15-20 minute segment on subject that probably couldn’t cover all of the issues and dynamics in a mini-series!

How do some of these issues pertain to our own circumstances?

Oh, I suppose we could write for hours on this and somehow, I think DW and I are blessed that we entered into a step-situation while all of the children were fairly young, ranging in ages at the time of 3 - 5.  Those ages are the ones where it’s not an unrealistic expectation that children have very open-minds, are in love with everything, and are generally playful and can relate to others pretty well.

In our case, DW and I both took the approach that we would simply “let the children come to us.”  There wasn’t going to be any trying too hard.  We would give of ourselves what the children wanted and in the early weeks and months, it was primarily about simply being a presence in the children’s lives.

DW and I also are very communicative, both between ourselves and with the children.  We knew early on that our parenting styles meshed, were complimentary, and almost perfectly in-tune with one another.  With regard to discipline, our approach is that we each take the lead with our own children, but there is nothing that prevents us from disciplining any of the kids at any time when it’s appropriate.  There is no “waiting until” the other gets home.  It has made for excellent consistency for the kids and every single one of them knows what to expect from either of us - THE SAME THING and there is, I can say with the utmost confidence, no bias/favoritism/preference when it comes to discipline.  The same thing goes for positive reinforcement for anything - games, school, etc.

We all want the same thing for all the kids… happy, successful lives and the hopes to produce well-adjusted, responsible, loving, friendly grown-ups.

Both DW and I are affectionate people.  In the affection department, I have it much easier than DW.  I’ll bet you can all guess what the difference is and wherein the problems lie?

SS1 and SD1 are friendly, very affectionate kids.  Always have been and probably always will be.  They’re not afraid to show me affection - hugs and even kisses from those two are the norm.  Obviously, they are that way, even moreso, with their mother and father.  Part of the reason for that is we have a great relationship with their father.  There is no competition here.  I am another supporting, loving adult in their lives, POE and DW are mom and dad.  We all have that understanding and no one is a “threat” to anyone else’s place in the children’s lives.  It’s been an easy transition and everyone gets along wonderfully.

S1 and S2 are friendly, very affectionate kids.  Always have been and hopefully always will be.  And while they are affectionate towards DW, they’re not nearly as affectionate towards her as SS1 and SD1 are towards me.  It wasn’t always like that.  Hugs and even kisses were part of the norm back in the early days, but less so now.  Probably for the first 12-18 months, they would have no qualms about sitting right up next to DW and have a book read or greet her with a hug and a peck-on-the-cheek.

But here is where a poor relationship with a psycho-ex has an impact on the children.  As bad as the alienation has been towards me, it’s probably been equally as bad towards DW.  When the kids have not only the PEW, but much of her dysfunctional family bad-mouthing the people who are caring for them half the time - it can have a devastating impact on a their well-being.  It most certainly will impact their comfort level when it comes to expressing affection towards DW when their mother and grandparents and aunt and other people whom they love are speaking poorly about her.

Sadly, it’s easy to see that slight hesitation, even apprehension, when the boys “discover themselves” having too much fun with or wanting to express affection towards DW.  This is the by-product of PEW’s mission to alienate the children.  As a perceived “threat” to their loyalty to her, loving anyone else is against her rules.  The children know this.  The children have been taught this.  And they act accordingly.

Fortunately, 50/50 shared parenting has been a blessing that we hope to maintain into adulthood, when they will be free to be with and see whoever they want whenever they want and can make happen.  Since the fall of 2007, that comfort level and affection-showing has been creeping back into their lives.  They do more with DW, they laugh more with DW, and they express themselves with DW more now than they have since the early days.  They’re learning that it’s not wrong to love their father.  They’re learning that it’s not wrong to love DW.  It’s not always easy for them, but they have two people who love them teaching them that it’s okay to be loving and caring towards people who love and care for them.  We teach them that it’s not a competition and that their mother doesn’t “lose love” because they care for others, even if mom doesn’t like them for any reason (or no reason at all).  Slowly, they will be able to feel completely comfortable.  They will be able to shed that inner feeling that has been planted there by the PEW - that loving someone else is a betrayal of their mother that will not be tolerated.

Step-Parents generally don’t have it easy.  It takes a tremendous amount of work.  A tremendous amount of patience.  A tremendous amount of care and love.  It also takes a thick skin.  When it comes to ex-spouses and step-parenting, DW and I have one situation that is the best of the best and another situation that approaches the worst of the worst.  You can rest-assured that we understand both ends of the spectrum.  We have a near-perfect situation with DW’s ex-husband.  We have a near-disastrous situation with LM’s ex-wife.  Depending upon where your story falls along that line… you can rest assured, we understand it!

Other step-parenting posts…

The Inevitable Discovery of ThePsychoExWife.Com

We’ve occasionally discussed what we thought might happen should the website be discovered.  We’re pretty sure that any number of things might occur and we’re pretty convinced that none of them would be particularly good.

We often speculate what might occur…

  • PEW would call CPS (again).
  • Maybe get her dumbass father to leave us a nice voice-mail again so he can say things like “whore” and “slut” and be all tough-guy on our asses.
  • PEW would call her normal brothers and see if they would beat me up on her behalf (despite them knowing how absolutely off-the-chain both PEW and Psycho-SIL are).
  • Threaten court (again).
  • She would project all of her self-hatred outward onto me (again).
  • She’ll definitely “tell my dad” on me.  My dad, not her dad.
  • She’ll tell others in my family.
  • Maybe she might send an email, that might look like this:

LM,

I have decided that tomorrow I am sending a letter to [CSE] asking them to terminate your child support payments to me. Then I am taking the entire contents of your www.thepsychoexwife.com website to court with me….I’m asking for an emergency hearing…because you have lost it. The whole scary thing is printed out, particularly the part where DW says she hates our kids…and they have social and behavioral problems…someday if they choose to be like me “they will have to go their own way”? I’m scared….this is scary…I’ve read it all and with every new article, it just got scarier. You are a scary scary individual….and DW is JUST as scary. You do not have to pay for the braces…..I did not realize how sick you actually were. I will pay for the braces by myself. I’m going to consult with a child psychologist and find out if the kids should know about this, because I can tell you…despite what they tell you, they are very loving and affectionate to me and I am to them as well….I’m thinking you and ugly have a big HATE expedition going on over there….it’s not healthy….and it’s weird since I granted you without a fight 50/50 custody…gave you a huge break on child support….I don’t even know who you’re talking about on that website, but it aint ME. Please don’t kill me….because as I was reading it that’s all I was thinking, you’re nuts. Keep your money…make love to it, wallpaper with it….make a loin cloth out of it….use it for psychotherapy (highly recommended) just stay the fuck away from me.

This is the last email you will ever receive from me.

you’re sick…. PEW

Well… that’s what I imagine it would look like if just such a discovery were to occur.  And if just such an email would actually be the result, I might be inclined to have the following thoughts based upon quotes from just such an email:

(more…)

A Father Begs for Time With the Children - Part 3

As we continue on from Part 2, the discussion continues on custody but also gets sidetracked by discussions regarding my alleged “deadbeatedness” - another break from reality. She starts by telling me that she’ll provide me the alleged receipts she was paying Mrs. JM for watching S2 for three half-days per week - a total of $160/week. Receipts that she would ultimately never produce.

PEW:

I had the copies of the checks to Mrs. JM and [childcare center] sitting on the table to give you when you dropped them off.

LM:

Okay. You can mail them or put them in the bag for the forthcoming weekend. I also have copies of the health insurance cards made and laminated. They are the same (one card for both boys) but I made two copies of it. I was going to just mail them to you.

PEW:

If anything I’ve paid way more than what is in the support order because of days off etc….for S1 when he can’t go to [childcare center]. I am also going to ask the judge that you pay for part of S2’s tuition for this year. Also, my salary is not going to wind up being $31000 for the year, so we might be going back to a support conference anyway. I have missed a lot of time with the kids being sick etc……not that I mind being there for my children. It’s just hard when you have NO other parent around.

LM:

For someone who doesn’t mind being there for the children, all you do is complain about it. So much so that even Gloria floated the idea of switching custody, which I would welcome.

PEW:

Listen, you don’t set me straight on anything with your emails. It’s all your little fairy tail in your head…everyone knows that LM. Nothing you ever write is true.

LM:

Documented facts say otherwise.

PEW:

That’s fine about the 25th, but I am not agreeing to the summer proposal. Not at all, you’ve refused to work with me, so until you have a court order.

LM:

6 revisions to the original request says otherwise. Thank you for the understanding regarding the 25th. I truly do appreciate it.

PEW:

You’ll have them for the two weeks you requested and every other weekend after that. I’m not in contempt of anything. You better talk to your lawyer before you start making threats.

LM:

I repeat, I’m not making threats. There is a court order in effect. There is an interim agreement for the balance of the school year which we both agreed to in front of the master. I am not threatening you. I am reminding you that there are consequences for taking a hard-line that is not in compliance with orders/agreements currently in existence. Remember? You asked for “no surprises” and “no underhandedness.” Again, doing so in the face of your combativeness to no benefit of my own.

This would end the 5th or 6th exchange. She lies about having receipts or canceled checks for Mrs. JM (because she wasn’t paying her anywhere near $160/week, if she was paying her anything at all). She ramps-up the projection, telling me that “nothing” I ever write is true. She thinks she’s entitled to an increase in support for time she misses from work. She (again) complains about having to care for the children.

The only good thing was that she backed-down in the face of me holding my ground on the upcoming weekend that was in question. The next back-and-forth…

PEW:

I’ve never complained about “being there” for the children. I’ve only complained that you are not there for the children therefore making it very much more difficult for US.

LM:

No, you complained about how much of a burden is was for you… a burden that would exist whether I was in [Neartown1] or [home-state]. [Neartown2] or [Neartown3]. [Neartown4] or [Neartown5]. A burden that exists because you wanted a divorce. As usual, your lack of foresight prevented you from understanding just how difficult life becomes for everyone involved when you make such a decision.

PEW:

There are no documented facts, just you and your ridiculous claims. Speaking of documents though, I can’t wait to go to court, because I have a few documented suprises for you.

LM:

I’m sure you do. While I want to focus on the future and the children, you want to focus on telling everyone who will give you 5 minutes to speak how awful I allegedly was during our marriage. Heck, even Gloria struggled to get you re-focused on the matter at hand and not complain about what happened a year ago or longer.

PEW:

And your revisions were ridiculous. You are ridiculous. I am the only one who ever made concessions, since day 1 which started May 1st 2004.

LM:

No they weren’t. Each time you created a new “issue” - I revised the schedule to accommodate each new roadblock. Each time, you would come up with something new after I gave up MORE meaningful time during the Summer, and then I would adjust again. That’s the reality. First it was the travel frequency. Then I adjusted. Then it was the time away from Mom. Then I adjusted. Then there were adjustments for vacations (normal). Then you requested adjustments that would chop more weekends out of the schedule. Adjustments for a Special Saturday. I mean, just as with most “negotiations” in the past - once I adjust to your latest “issue” - you come up with a new hoop to jump through. Then, you agree to my proposed Summer but “don’t want to make it a part of an official order” because you want to see how the kids adjust? Rarely do your requests amount to much more than superficial delays and roadblocks. As I’ve said before, I will say again - it’s a matter of “control” for you. There is really is nothing more (of major concern) that needs to be ironed out. If you agree to this reasonable Summer/School schedule, it doesn’t leave a whole lot for you to hold over me now does it?

PEW:

The court order that we agreed to in front of the master is for every other weekend. That’s it, that’s all….that is the court order…..and it was “temporary” remember? I was trying to be nice by letting you try that situation out first. I didn’t have to agree to that.

LM:

The agreement in front of the Custody Master was for the remainder of the school year so as not to disrupt the school schedule. That’s what we agreed to. And no, you didn’t have to agree to it, but the end result of that decision would have been “no agreement” and the existing order would remain in force until we had a modification hearing.

PEW:

Again, I can’t wait to get in front of a judge this time. You are not going to get every other weekend and you’re not going to get the summer proposal. You’re not. No judge would give that to you when you’ve been so irresponsible and cavalier no matter what Gloria puts in her report.

LM:

Perhaps not, but one thing is for certain, I’ve neither been irresponsible nor cavalier on any of these matters. That’s simply another one of those things you tell yourself and others in order to convince yourself you are “the righteous one” through all of this. I’ve been exceedingly responsible, from providing financial support, providing emotional support and remaining in constant contact with the boys (when you actually answer the phone or have them call me back when you’re not available when I do call). Your problem is that you can’t dictate all of things that I do and I am not there to say “how high” when you say “jump.”

If you would just wake up someday and decide that you are no longer going to be angry and bitter about the past and come to agreement on what is very reasonable Summer and School schedule, the overwhelming majority of “issues” are gone. However, that will leave you nothing to argue about and cry “victim” over, and right now, you don’t appear ready to move on.

I suppose court will tell what the ultimate outcome will be. Just remember, should I end up not receiving the schedule I have requested - I hope that when you sit down in the aftermath you will find that your efforts were worth it. That using the kids to “get back” at me was worth it. And when you’re whining about how I am not there for the kids and can’t help you and don’t do things with them - it will be because you fought to make it that way. Though that won’t be your version of reality - it will be reality just the same. What a total tragedy that you can’t think of the kids and agree to let them spend primary time with me for 2 months out of a 12 month year because of your bitterness. You never have bridged the yawning chasm that is the gap between your contention that the boys need me in their lives more - and your efforts to prevent it. You couldn’t do it in the custody evaluations. You can’t do it during our discussions (via email or voice). Your argument that it “needs” to be with me living in [custody state] is self-serving and has nothing to do with the children.

Are you exhausted yet?

She’s already prepared to dismiss Gloria’s report if it doesn’t go in her favor.  I can tell you this… Gloria had her pegged in our sessions and was really concerned (details later), particularly about Psycho-SIL living there.

The only other comments I’ll make here was to note her comment about “having documentation” that would surprise me.  After 5-years, not one surprising document has been produced.  There aren’t any.  Not a single police report despite her telling people that there were.  Not a single bad review at any workplace.  No police record.  Nothing.  To this day, though, she still believes a great many things that simply don’t exist… including all of these “documents” that show how awful a person I am.

Part 4 looms… and you’ll watch me repeatedly beg her to just stop the madness. Of course, you know now that it’s 2009, fully 4-years after this exchange… and she hasn’t. And she won’t.

Spending a Lot to Get a Little

By May of 2005, everything from the divorce and equitable distribution had been almost entirely settled.  That is, except for the small matter of $1,000 that was being held in escrow over a dispute involving credit card statements and money to be paid to me for repair necessary to get the marital residence up for sale.

Not that you need another example, but this is another one that demonstrates that she’s willing to litigate no matter the costs. There is no “risk/reward analysis” in PEW’s repertoire. In this case, despite being owed more (again), I was willing (again) to just split things down the middle to be rid of one less loose string.

As time passed, I thought it was time to get that matter resolved and sent her the following email:

PEW,

Just wanted to drop you a line and find out if you wanted to just simply split and disburse the $1,000 that was put into escrow? I’m guessing [my attorney] by now has contacted [your attorney] to transfer it from her escrow account to his escrow account and he asked me what, if anything, was up?

I told him that I would ask you what you wanted to do. Figuring that any differences between the CCs and what was owed to get the house ready for sale (approximately $1,100) would be pretty close to a wash and I would suggest just splitting it 50/50.

He said if you were agreeable to that, he would just send us each a check.

Let me know what you want to do. If you that’s okay with you, you would probably have to send or fax him a letter to that effect.

~LM

Of course, handling matters simply is also not in her bag of bizarre, either.

LM,

I still haven’t seen your credit card balance. In our agreement it says you are going to provide me with copies of your credit card bills from 5/04 showing that you cc balance equalled my cc balance. And I’ll agree to no such thing considering all the car repairs I’ve gotten screwed with. It can wait till I’m done with the house deal. I can only do one thing at a time. Tell [your attorney] I intend to file the necessary paperwork with the court next month some time.

How much was left in there? The side walk was supposed to be paid through that right?

~PEW

Unreal. So, assuming that she would somehow be entitled to the entire $1,000 (which she wasn’t), she would arrange to file paperwork to have a hearing which would cost, at the very least, $1,000 to initiate and follow-through on. That would be $1,000 costs to obtain $500.  Notice the entitlement - expecting me to pay for her secretly amassed credit card debt, she wanted confirmation that my credit card balance was equal to hers.

PEW,

There was $1,000 set aside. And no, I paid for the sidewalk, the heater cert, and the electrical cert myself on the promise that you would pay me at settlement.

I also confirmed that the CC statements that were requested were sent to [your attorney]. I think that the difference between mine and yours was either $600 or $800… which is why I suggested just splitting the escrow since it cost about $1,100 in sidewalk & certs for which you were responsible for half.

If you would rather wait or go to court or review whatever, that’s no problem. Just figured I would suggest saving us one less headache is all.

~LM

Yep… “on the promise.” Another agreement scuttled by the psycho ex-wife.

LM,

Well also there is the consideration of the fact that you haven’t paid anything towards S2’s tuition for 2004/2005. So yeah, I guess we will go to court over it. Plus, [my attorney] is holding my documents until I sign a release holding her harmless for the antics of this year and I’m just not willing to do that at this point, so I guess I won’t see those statements until we go to court.

~PEW

Surprise! Her attorney isn’t as stupid as I had first thought. It’s her client that’s the buffoon. At this point, PEW’s attorney #1 must have realized with whom she was dealing and was circling the wagons to protect herself from PEW-inspired litigation. Can you say - “what goes around… comes around?” PEW was posturing about suing her attorney for not being able to deliver on the many promises made after PEW spent tens-of-thousands of dollars to get the windfall she was expecting from our rather meager marital assets.

Plus, the tuition for S2 was all hers. As usual, she has conveniently forgotten that the judge in the whole Where the Children Would Go to School matter gave his approval for S2 to be put in daycare (despite the fact that PEW was stay-at-home during the week), but it would be on her dime.

I can’t remember when, but this matter was ultimately resolved by PEW finally agreeing to just split the escrow amount 50/50. Of course, this wasn’t until after I had retained D-Mac, so there was the whole hassle of getting the escrow money transferred from my first attorney to her, letters and calls back-and-forth… my recollection is probably enough unnecessary communication to eat up all that was disbursed on both sides. No surprise there.

Child Support Modification & Early Childcare Issues: 2005

This is a long one. Get your popcorn ready.

Once the original (pre-relocation) custody agreement was put in place, she immediately filed for a modification of support (despite previous claims that she wouldn’t in order to get things settled).  Just to be clear, the amount of support I would be left to pay would have been the same given the arrangement.  Staying or going didn’t change that.

My first attorney would make a huge mistake here that would be the last one I would allow.  In what would prove to be the first of many disagreements over appropriate childcare, my attorney would mistakenly indicate at the support conference that I was okay with PEW’s arrangements for a private babysitter (a friend).  While I don’t think it would have changed the contentiousness that would exist over the issue, I just couldn’t stand for such a glaring error.  I mean, it was precisely the opposite of what I had conveyed to him.

The figures were something like this:  for 3-months (before my health insurance kicked-in) - my child support figure would be 45.5% of my net income.  After 3-months, it would go down to 40.0% of my net income.  Given my possible living arrangements in the area, after rent for an apartment, I would have been left with less than $1,000/month with which to take care of all other regular expenses: food, insurances, gas, utilities, clothes, shoes, phone, etc.  That meant no savings nor planning for my own future, let alone the future of the children.  That was impossible even minimizing things.  Had I gone bare-bones basic, I likely would have been left with a place to live that those in the family court cartel would have scrutinized as being inadequate for the 2 children, which likely would have led to a further erosion of my custody time (and a likely further increase in child support). Remember - this child support figure was calculated using a licensed, certified childcare facility. This is important to remember because almost immediately after this was entered as the order, she would not put the kids into the childcare center we had agreed to.

Making matters worse, PEW was “padding her financial stats” to make sure that I ended up paying for things she claimed at a high rate of expense, when she was paying out less than disclosed to the court.  Her primary area of making extra money was by exploiting the childcare arrangements for which she would later be found in contempt of court. This would be the first example of this:

LM,

I was just offered a job yesterday that I am taking. It is a regular mon-fri 9-5 workweek. Here’s my question for you. I’d like to see if one of the mom’s at S2’s school would consider watching him for the rest of the school year, so that he could finish out the year at [St. Church's], but at the same time I’m thinking and wondering if you’re going to give me a problem with paying her. Most people want cash for this, they don’t want to claim it as income. The problem is when we go to the support conference, If it’s not an actual day care setting….are you going to have a problem paying half?

Also, it would be nice to work out this custody thing so I can start making arrangements for them to go to summer camp on the weeks they are with me. Also, what are your plans for them in the summer? Will they be going to camp? Staying home while you’re at work?

I really had to make this work move because of you moving. There was no way I was going to be able to cover those 2 or 3 weekends. It’s too much and I called a nanny service and I’d have to pay more than I make.

~PEW

So, the shenanigans are already starting. The only point I’d like to make here is that her last paragraph is a lie. She didn’t make his job change because of my moving, as much as she would like to portray that as reality. She was planning this move for sometime as previous posts have detailed. She leveraged her stay-at-home-during-the-week status to win the primary custody recommendation from the custody evaluation. PEW repeatedly informed me that she would be taking a 9-5 job for since the summer of 2004. Further, given how normal interview processes take, she was fully involved in job-seeking before I ever disclosed to her that I was taking a new job and relocating… it was only about 2-weeks later that she told me this.

This was followed up by another custody settlement plea from her…

LM,

I am writing this to beg you to please re-consider what you are trying to do with the custody. I spoke to two other attorneys who informed me that you’ll never get every other weekend because it’s too much for the children. They said none of the judges would go for that. The summer deal, we can tweak it, but I’m not going for all summer. I can’t just drive over there and visit at will. You were always welcome here when you were around the corner, but you never took me up on it. I don’t think the kids (especially S2) could be away from me ALL SUMMER. If you want to split it this summer 50/50, 2 weeks there, 2 weeks here, 2 there, 2 here….I can do that.

~PEW

Followed by…

LM,

I can’t keep spending thousands of dollars on this attorney. I’m going broke. I want to get the kids into a house.

Same for the support. If the attorney’s could just work together then we wouldn’t have to go to a conference. There are guidelines in place for just that reason. They come up with a figure then we agree or disagree and that saves us from having to sit up in [court house] for a whole afternoon and me having to pay my attorney a whole weeks pay to sit there with me.

Working with me on this would go a long long way to burying the hatchet….PLEASE

~PEW

Sad. Pathetic. It’s all about what she wants. Her plea is centered around her belief that the children won’t be able to handle being away from “her” all summer. I guess all of her posturing and fighting over the course of the prior year to minimize their time with me wouldn’t adversely affect the children, right? My proposal was to reverse the custody arrangement for the summer and that would be “too much” for the children to handle. But the 9-months that they’re in school and I am living that arrangement, well, that doesn’t matter so much.

Conveniently, she wants to pick a provider that wants to make sure she is paid in such a way as there is no accounting for the actual costs. No surprise there.

Oh, and if I just accede to her demands, THEN she’ll bury the hatchet. Yeah, right between my eyes as she’s always done.

PEW,

The problem is when we go to the support conference, If it’s not an actual day care setting, there is no accountability for the costs associated with your friend, JM. Further, we can’t claim it on our taxes. Finally - we could get into a heap of trouble due to the whole nanny tax issue that seems to be all over the news lately.

At this time, I have not made any plans for them for the Summer as the custody issue remains unresolved. If you are not amenable to having primary custody revert to me during the Summer, we’ll have to go to court to resolve the matter, unfortunately.

~LM

Her reply…

LM,

You still didn’t answer the question about child care. If it is a private home setting till June for S2 are you going to give me a problem with sharing that expense? I’m sure people aren’t going to want to report it as income. If it is going to be a problem then I guess I’ll have to go with a traditional day care. Which I may have to do anyway if I can’t find someone.

I got one of the mom’s at [St. Church's] to watch S2. JM, she’s the president of the CYO. She also subs for S2’s teacher so he already knows her. It will be $160/week. S1’s will be $15/day. In sept. it will be a little more for S2 because he’ll be going full time, 5 days/week at a nursury school, I’m not sure which one yet.

~PEW

$160/week with her “friend.” This was far more expensive than other options available to us for S2. It’s important to remember that he would be watched for exactly 3 half-days. Of course, S1’s aftercare, which amounted to pretty close to the same amount of time over a full week at school, would only be $75. Something doesn’t add up here.

I told her that I was not in agreement with her unilaterally choosing JM to watch S2 and things escalated from there. She told me that she didn’t have to consult with me on childcare. Wrong. She absolutely did.

(more…)


MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES