More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Archive: articles

Watch Out for the “Border-LION”: Borderline Personality Disorder

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

Consider this a follow-up to the guest post:  “It’s Not That They Won’t, They Can’t”

For those of us dealing with a situation in which we have to interact with a borderline (or suspected borderline), this follow-up offers an overview of the drivers of their behaviors and their inability to control them without intervention.  It can be difficult to wrap our heads around, but if you can set aside your own personal experiences for just a moment and consider the illness, it does offer important, if not “difficult to digest” insight.

———-

WATCH OUT FOR THE “BORDER-LION”

Have you ever wondered why your ex-partner (or partner’s ex-partner) can have hysterical outbursts, hitting objects and even threatening violence toward others? There is a technical name for this behavior: impulsive aggression.

In my book The Essential Family Guide to Borderline Personality Disorder: New Tools and Techniques to Stop Walking on Eggshells, I call it the “border-lion” because it’s a ferocious beast that is uncaged when person’s emotions are so strong and overwhelming they can’t be contained. (Impulsive aggression is not exclusive to BPD, but a component of several impulse control disorders such as intermittent explosive disorder.)

Impulsive aggression:

  • Is impulsive, unplanned, and reckless (that is, the person gives no thought to the consequences of his actions). Impulsivity is a key point.
  • Can be triggered by threats of rejection or abandonment paired with frustration.
  • Is like a biological “tug-of-war” between the logical and emotional aspects of the brain, in which the logical side loses. These aggressive tendencies can be inherited.
  • It comprises verbal hostility, physical hostility, or both, with the purpose of hurting another person or self.
  • It can: be turned outward, (such as outbursts, rages, hitting objects, or violence toward others) or inward (such as suicide attempts or self-injury).

The first rule of communicating with an enraged BP is know when not to communicate! Safety, physical and emotional, always comes first. Here is an excerpt from The Essential Family Guide:

Gauge the intensity of your family member’s anger on a scale of one to ten, with ten being high. According to Christopher Bojrab, MD, people with BPD may be able to calm themselves down when the emotional level ranges from one to five. At six and above, without treatment they may not be able to calm themselves down.

If your family member is at a six or higher, visualize the emotional centers of his brain going ka-ching! ka-ching! ka-ching! like a slot machine spewing forth tokens. Your family member’s thoughts and feelings are warped and what he’s saying makes about as much sense as throwing away your hard-earned money in games you know are designed to put your cash into the casino’s pocket.

Don’t listen to your family member berate you and call you names. Right now, he can’t see your point of view or think through the effects of his interactions with others. It’s not that he won’t; it’s that he can’t. Verbal abuse harms you: ongoing, repeated verbal assaults can be every bit as emotionally devastating as physical battering-especially when it is meted out by an intimate partner or by someone in a position of authority. Anxiety, low self-esteem, and depression are all tied to verbal abuse.

Instead, bring the interaction to a temporary close. Say, “I will not discuss this any more if you continue to yell. I am willing to be supportive and listen if you can tell me what it is you want and need.” If the rage continues, leave immediately (or ask your family member to leave).

Repeat any of the following statements. Don’t argue or try to have the last word. Notice that these statements don’t point fingers at your family director:

  • “I want to hear about it, but it’s hard for me when things get too emotional” (instead of “you get too emotional”).
  • “We’ll talk later, when things calm down. I want to give you my full attention, and that’s too hard for me to do right now.”
  • “I can’t listen right now. Not until things are calmer.”
  • “Let me have a little while to calm down and then we can talk.”

Say to yourself:

  • “I am not going to take this personally. This is the border-lion talking.”
  • “If I stay here and argue, things are going to escalate. If I stay and get beaten down, it’s going to hurt me and the relationship.”
  • “My family member can’t grasp all that right now, but I can. I am deciding to do what’s best, even if it doesn’t feel comfortable right now. It will get more comfortable as I keep doing it.”

Although impulsive aggression has a genetic basic and can be treated with medication, that doesn’t excuse the behavior. But keeping this in mind may help you depersonalize it.

IT’S NOT ABOUT YOU. IT’S PROBABLY NOT ABOUT ANY IMMEDIATE ISSUES BUT SOMETHING DEEPER.

Sources:

1. http://www.mhsanctuary.com/Borderline/siever.htm

2. The Essential Family Guide to Borderline Personality Disorder: New Tools and Techniques to Stop Walking on Eggshells (2008) Hazelden Publishing.

Fantasy Custody and Child Support Guidelines

Let’s make a list of all the rules and guidelines that should be set regarding custody and child support in this country, sort of your wish list, based on what would truly be best for the children and equality for BOTH parents. I’ll start:

A woman gets pregnant.  Since she can abort up to 24-weeks with no input from the father, thus ending her responsibility, the father has 24-weeks from whenever he finds out he has a child (or is expecting one) to decide if he really wants to accept the child as his own. (I know this is a shocker for most people, but really, women get to decide everything, this is only fair, and would certainly make women think twice about birth control/sex if they thought they might be 100% responsible for caring for the child.) There could be an addendum to the rule that a contract is signed between the parties before sex/conception that indicates both are willing to parent any child created between them between certain dates and neither parent could then abdicate responsibility… i.e. accept responsibility before having sex, acknowledging that sex can ZOMG - lead to a child, DUH!

A woman MUST inform a father before a child is born that he is the father, or she forfeits ANY child support she may be entitled to at any time. If she is incorrect about the father, SORRY, it is now his choice if he wants to support the child, when he finally finds out, he has the 24-weeks to decide.

Shared parenting is mandatory unless it is proven in criminal court that one parent or the other has, or, is at risk of endangering the child, whether that means physically or emotionally. This includes fathers who find out years later that they have a child.  Yep, sorry Mom, he is back in your life and not just to give you money!

Child support is based on actual expenses for the child, possibly going by the consumer price index that currently spells out acceptable expenses for bankruptcy filings, or some other reasonable index that accounts for costs and not spending habits (as it currently does). Each parent puts their portion into a monthly fund and the reasonable expenses are paid for from there. In 50/50 shared parenting, there would be no child support since each parent would have the child half of the time and would be responsible for half of the expenses. If a parent has been deemed unfit or decided not to participate in the child’s life for personal or professional reasons such as living too far away, the child support would go into the fund, and the parent receiving the child support would be responsible for providing a running account of expenses paid for the child and/or provide legitimate receipts that would initiate disposition of funds from the child support fund.  At the date of emancipation, any unused funds shall be returned to the payer of child support.

Mandatory DNA testing at birth for everyone.  If the father is unknown at the time of birth, mandatory DNA testing will take place for anyone filing for child support against a purported father before any judgment is made.

States do not receive funding based on how much child support they collect, they receive funding based on how many children have both parents in their life a minimum of 40% of the time.

Punishments for custodial interference shall be equal to those of not paying child support, including loss of license, certifications, seizing of bank accounts and tax returns, up to and including jail time and will pursued with the same speed, viciousness, and vigor as currently for those who fail to pay child support.

False abuse allegations in custody cases are met with mandatory jail time of not less than the minimum time the falsely accused faced if convicted.

Parental alienation, if proven to be deliberate, consistent, and ongoing shall result in an immediate and complete loss of physical custody to the targeted parent.  The offending parent will be granted supervised visitation for a period of not less than a year and can apply to have some physical custody reinstated if they can show that they have completed (successfully) courses on parental alienation and parenting with exemplary grades.

That’s a healthy start… now it’s time for you to add yours to the list…

Teenagers, Children, and Step-Family Experiences

A few weeks ago, the Today Show on NBC had a segment called “Teens and Step-Families” which featured a panel of a couple of “experts” and a group of teens from around the country to share their experiences.

On their parents dating:

Only 1 of the 10 had an issue with their parent dating.  One young lady was upset that her father started dating after her mother died.  He began to see someone a little more than a year after his wife’s death.  She went on to say that eventually she realized that she needed to be more mature and understanding about the situation, even though at 12, that can be a pretty lofty expectation.  We would imagine that going through what are almost always difficult teen years, between hormones, relationship developments with peers, schooling, pending adulthood - the introduction of a new adult figure in your life, especially given the mother was deceased, can only add to that angst.

On the new adult taking on a parental role:

The teens were asked about how forcefully or quickly the new parental-figure in their lives tried to establish a parental-role in the household.  One young-man said that in his mother’s case (step-father), the man did try to establish his authority over the children and that sometimes caused issues between mom and step-dad as well as between the kids and step-dad.  Interestingly, it was because they (the kids) “didn’t always agree” with the sanctions.  I’m not sure I know too many kids who agree with any discipline no matter who it comes from.

On the strangeness or weirdness of seeing your parent being affectionate with a new partner:

One young man spoke about how his biological parents were typically openly affectionate with one another and that his advice to people in similar situations was to “get over it.”  He went on to say that parents are entitled to be affectionate with their new partners and to express love and good feelings for one another.  It has to be expected and accepted.

Still another young lady made some very salient points about the experiences and feelings of the children.  She said that one of the things that she struggled with was the conflict about her feelings of fairness with regard to her mother carrying on her life and her own feelings of loss and disappointment at the broken family.

Paraphrasing:

We may disregard our own feelings about certain situations we experience because we know that our parents are entitled to carry on with their own lives.  We know that they are allowed to spend the rest of their lives with someone if that’s what they choose to do.  Still, it conflicts with our own feelings about how disappointed we are that our parents didn’t stay together in the first place.  We sacrifice our own feelings for the sake of our parent’s feelings.

The kids want to assure their parents that everything is “just fine” even though everything may not be.  So, it would appear that in addition to the struggles that children sometimes find themselves in when their biological parents split (blaming themselves somehow for the break-up), they find themselves with some sort of emotional whiplash in trying to avoid any appearance of being the cause for upset in their new relationship.

On the subject of the addition of new family members (half-siblings):

I was pleasantly surprised to see that none of the 10 teen panelists felt “left out” or like the “odd person out” when children were born of the new relationship.  Clearly, 10 people don’t represent a cross-section of all of the children in step-situations, so I think it’s safe to assume that there may be some level of awkwardness that would hopefully wane over time.

The discipline issue:

Several struggled with the issue of discipline as it came from the new step-parent.  One young man told of being very apprehensive and defiant in the face of discipline that came from his step-mother.  However, he said that with the backing of his father, it wasn’t long before he learned that he needed to listen.  He was often faced with his father telling him in every situation that the approach that step-mom took in each scenario was appropriate and that she was correct and knew what she was doing.  The teen went on to say that it became difficult to be defiant when your biological parent was there reinforcing that what step-mom was undertaking was appropriate in his eyes, too.  “Over the years, it became much more easy to listen to her.”

Another young man spoke of being a “momma’s boy” and being protective of his mother, so when she brought someone new home, he would do everything in his power to act mean and obnoxious and try to run the new guy off!  He continued to explain that as he looks back on it now that he is older, he realizes that he needed to be much more mature in his treatment of others and that communication is essential to make that happen.  He was referring to the child communicating more and more effectively with the parent, stating that if you are more open and communicative with your parent about how you’re feeling (and why) - everyone can work together to create more harmony and less upset.

Only one of the teens expressed never really connecting with her step-mother, primarily because she “wasn’t a very good listener” when she tried to express herself.

On the subject of existing new family members (step-siblings):

Several indicated that the step-parent showed “favoritism” towards their own children versus the step-children.  Explanations seemed to show that “favoritism” was not necessarily the best term to use.  One teen, however, looks back and surmises that the step-parent is probably concerned with the appearance of trying to “take over” for the biological parent.  As result, there was an understanding of the different levels of affection/attention shown towards the biological children versus the step-children.  They have a better understanding as older teens at the struggles that all step-parents face.

Dr. Janet Taylor - a psychiatrist - supported the assertions of the teen panel by reinforcing that communication is essential to a successful transition, even if it’s not the easiest thing to accomplish.  Setting boundaries and being clear about expectations won’t happen by default.  Further, if the step-parent and biological parent are on the same page and convey similar messages, the transition can expect to be the smoothest.

Gary Neuman - family counselor and author - focused on the integration of step-parents into a teen child’s life.  Given the changes and relationship development that is happening in the teen’ s life and social circles, the addition of a new parental figure can be especially stressful.  Gary pointed out something I think may sometimes be overlooked and that is, becoming a family “takes time.”  One can’t just appear and expect to be the perfect parent overnight, even if they are a perfect parent! The child(ren)’s personality has developed as the result of another half of the parental partnership over a long period of time.  The best step-parent/step-child relationships are likely to develop slowly, over time.

Time and again the common theme became of one of clear communication and consistent boundaries.  A parent or step-parent can neither be affectionate nor disciplinarian without being able to share care and compassion.  Dr. Taylor went a step further when it came to a discussion regarding affection and discipline, particularly discipline.

Paraphrased:

As a step-parent, if you step in and say that I’m not part of that family or that issue and let the mother or father deal with that issue, the dynamic that you’re setting up over the long haul is dangerous.

It’s a marital issue and it’s a communication issue and both the biological parent and step-parent have to have a complete understanding about how these issues can play out.  If this is not clear throughout the entire family, the step-parent will neither have the respect nor the authority that is warranted in a normal functioning household.

What should be done when a step-child is simply not treating the step-parent well at all?

The family counselor stated that the biological parent must step-up and convey to the children that they must have respect and cordiality towards the step-parent.  It is not optional.  It is an expectation.  The love and family feeling will develop with a meaningful effort on all parties, including the children.

The psychiatrist also added to keep in mind, particularly with teens, that it is the teenager’s nature to “push back” and it’s rather likely that the step-parent is getting no more animosity in certain situations than a biological parent might expect to see.  She stressed it’s important to avoid taking this personally.  Have a broader view of what is taking place and avoid blaming it solely on the fact that you’re not the child’s biological parent.  There may be bigger issues at work here.

Some of the teens chimed in that for them, it was/is essential that the step-parent communicate early and often that you are all part of the “same team.”  You all love the biological parent and that can be a common thread on which to build a relationship.  It is not and will not ever be a competition between biological parents and step-parents.  We’re all just trying to get along the best way we know how with the resources we have available to do that.  It’s easiest to make a better life for all if all are doing the best they can towards that end.

All-in-all it was a well produced segment that managed to hit on most of the important issues as best as possible for what amounted to a 15-20 minute segment on subject that probably couldn’t cover all of the issues and dynamics in a mini-series!

How do some of these issues pertain to our own circumstances?

Oh, I suppose we could write for hours on this and somehow, I think DW and I are blessed that we entered into a step-situation while all of the children were fairly young, ranging in ages at the time of 3 - 5.  Those ages are the ones where it’s not an unrealistic expectation that children have very open-minds, are in love with everything, and are generally playful and can relate to others pretty well.

In our case, DW and I both took the approach that we would simply “let the children come to us.”  There wasn’t going to be any trying too hard.  We would give of ourselves what the children wanted and in the early weeks and months, it was primarily about simply being a presence in the children’s lives.

DW and I also are very communicative, both between ourselves and with the children.  We knew early on that our parenting styles meshed, were complimentary, and almost perfectly in-tune with one another.  With regard to discipline, our approach is that we each take the lead with our own children, but there is nothing that prevents us from disciplining any of the kids at any time when it’s appropriate.  There is no “waiting until” the other gets home.  It has made for excellent consistency for the kids and every single one of them knows what to expect from either of us - THE SAME THING and there is, I can say with the utmost confidence, no bias/favoritism/preference when it comes to discipline.  The same thing goes for positive reinforcement for anything - games, school, etc.

We all want the same thing for all the kids… happy, successful lives and the hopes to produce well-adjusted, responsible, loving, friendly grown-ups.

Both DW and I are affectionate people.  In the affection department, I have it much easier than DW.  I’ll bet you can all guess what the difference is and wherein the problems lie?

SS1 and SD1 are friendly, very affectionate kids.  Always have been and probably always will be.  They’re not afraid to show me affection - hugs and even kisses from those two are the norm.  Obviously, they are that way, even moreso, with their mother and father.  Part of the reason for that is we have a great relationship with their father.  There is no competition here.  I am another supporting, loving adult in their lives, POE and DW are mom and dad.  We all have that understanding and no one is a “threat” to anyone else’s place in the children’s lives.  It’s been an easy transition and everyone gets along wonderfully.

S1 and S2 are friendly, very affectionate kids.  Always have been and hopefully always will be.  And while they are affectionate towards DW, they’re not nearly as affectionate towards her as SS1 and SD1 are towards me.  It wasn’t always like that.  Hugs and even kisses were part of the norm back in the early days, but less so now.  Probably for the first 12-18 months, they would have no qualms about sitting right up next to DW and have a book read or greet her with a hug and a peck-on-the-cheek.

But here is where a poor relationship with a psycho-ex has an impact on the children.  As bad as the alienation has been towards me, it’s probably been equally as bad towards DW.  When the kids have not only the PEW, but much of her dysfunctional family bad-mouthing the people who are caring for them half the time - it can have a devastating impact on a their well-being.  It most certainly will impact their comfort level when it comes to expressing affection towards DW when their mother and grandparents and aunt and other people whom they love are speaking poorly about her.

Sadly, it’s easy to see that slight hesitation, even apprehension, when the boys “discover themselves” having too much fun with or wanting to express affection towards DW.  This is the by-product of PEW’s mission to alienate the children.  As a perceived “threat” to their loyalty to her, loving anyone else is against her rules.  The children know this.  The children have been taught this.  And they act accordingly.

Fortunately, 50/50 shared parenting has been a blessing that we hope to maintain into adulthood, when they will be free to be with and see whoever they want whenever they want and can make happen.  Since the fall of 2007, that comfort level and affection-showing has been creeping back into their lives.  They do more with DW, they laugh more with DW, and they express themselves with DW more now than they have since the early days.  They’re learning that it’s not wrong to love their father.  They’re learning that it’s not wrong to love DW.  It’s not always easy for them, but they have two people who love them teaching them that it’s okay to be loving and caring towards people who love and care for them.  We teach them that it’s not a competition and that their mother doesn’t “lose love” because they care for others, even if mom doesn’t like them for any reason (or no reason at all).  Slowly, they will be able to feel completely comfortable.  They will be able to shed that inner feeling that has been planted there by the PEW - that loving someone else is a betrayal of their mother that will not be tolerated.

Step-Parents generally don’t have it easy.  It takes a tremendous amount of work.  A tremendous amount of patience.  A tremendous amount of care and love.  It also takes a thick skin.  When it comes to ex-spouses and step-parenting, DW and I have one situation that is the best of the best and another situation that approaches the worst of the worst.  You can rest-assured that we understand both ends of the spectrum.  We have a near-perfect situation with DW’s ex-husband.  We have a near-disastrous situation with LM’s ex-wife.  Depending upon where your story falls along that line… you can rest assured, we understand it!

Other step-parenting posts…

Purple Heart’s Final Beat - A Soldier Suicide Story

It is no secret that some of the most downtrodden of fathers in our family court system come from the military. While off in other lands fighting wars on behalf of the freedom of others - on the home front, they’re not often given any protection when their spouse chooses to file for divorce in his absence. Oftentimes, that divorce is granted. Oftentimes, he doesn’t even know about it until he comes home from combat to find:

  • He’s lost his family.
  • He’s lost his children.
  • He’s lost his home and all of his other assets.
  • He’s a fugitive from justice for failure to pay child support while in combat.
  • He’s credit is destroyed.
  • That those he volunteered to help defend with his life, couldn’t give a rat’s ass about his predicament.

The Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act provides that - if a parent moves with a child(ren) to a new state, that new state becomes the child’s presumptive residence after six months. Unfortunately, the grim reality for military personnel is that deployments for war are often much longer than 6-months. In effect, a military spouse can move to another state while her spouse is deployed, divorce him, and then be almost guaranteed to gain custody of the child(ren) through the divorce proceedings in the new state. All of this is done in his absence. All of this is done while he is in no position to fight it. All of this is done with the help and because of the greed of our Family Court System.

There is almost nothing an enlisted man can do to stop it, either. Though the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act affords military personnel some small measures of protection while they are deployed (unavailable prior to 2003), the devastating impact on such circumstances is resulting in ever-increasing numbers of suicides by military personnel who are left homeless, without their children, with unreasonable child support orders, and in poverty because a wife decided to cut & run with the children, the money, the assets - everything - while he was deployed during war.

I urge you to spend the 5-1/2 minutes to watch this very powerful video - a tribute to a fallen hero, a decorated soldier and Purple-Heart Award recipient.

Thanks to SDDAD who brought this to our attention and offered the following commentary:

I work as a police dispatcher for mid size community in So Cal. I see and hear all sorts of things that usually just flow over me with very little reaction. It is a coping mech that helps us deal with the heartache and pain we deal with on a daily basis. Being a military town, one of the things that comes through our phones every now and then is the service member that comes home from deployment to find his (or her) spouse has left with the children. It is heart breaking. Somebody sent me this video the other day and it actually brought me to tears.

Warning, this is a very moving and sad clip. It is not graphic in any sense other than that message it projects. But should you watch it…when you are done, please pay tribute to those that serve their country. Everything we have is due to their service and sacrifice.

To the men and women serving in our armed forces…THANK YOU!

It brought tears to my eyes, too.  We really appreciate you sharing this.  I recently sat down and spoke at length with an enlisted man about this site and what we try to do in helping others through tough times.  This occurred about 2-weeks ago.  I promised him that I would do some posts to bring light to the special suffering that is brought upon “many of my friends in the military” (his words) who are going through just such situations and need help.

SDDAD gave us a powerful way to start.

Thanks again to the men and women who serve in our armed forces. You endure enough with your work and should not have to be treated so awfully when you return.  Our thoughts and prayers are with you.

Mom Kidnaps Children, Flees, is Caught - No Arrest, No Charges.

Another in what is sure to be a long line of stories we post regarding the bias against fathers in family court situations, I offer you the case of the missing Norris children, Parker and Preston - aged 2 and 3.

Their boys’ 27-year old mother, Nicole Butcher, allegedly kidnaps the children and flees their home area of Kitittas, Washington.  She does not have custody of the children.  She allegedly also left a suicide note and authorities were quick to put forth the excuse that “she is suicidal” after their discovery and apprehension in Nevada.

From the article:

Investigators said Butcher was not placed under arrest because the situation has more domestic implications than criminal ones.

This may be surprising to some, but it’s not to me if you look for and read enough stories.  The media and the authorities, across a broad range of topics, lean heavily towards finding excuses and justifications for women’s crimes & associated sentencing.  It’s in civil matters.  It’s in criminal matters.  And it’s not a secret that it’s a huge problem in family court.

In this case, a mother who appears not to have custody of the children, kidnaps and flees the state.  Soon after their discovery, are there any local arrests?  No.  Are there any Federal arrests for kidnapping and fleeing across state lines?  Nope.  Is there excuse-making and justification for the mother’s actions?  There sure are and it’s not uncommon, either.

Forgive my apparent lack of sympathy, but the reality is that if the gender roles were reversed and this situation involved a father who kidnapped his children (sans custody rights) and left behind a menacing note threatening harm to self or others - there would be no sympathetic reporter writing a story.  There would be no sympathetic federal, state, and/or local authorities expressing concern of the mental stability of the father to justify not arresting him and charging him with kidnapping.

His ass would be in jail.  End of story.

Not a mother, though.  Too often there is some kind of excuse or justification for their criminal action which, if they even garner arrest and charges… assuming a successful prosecution, the female will most certainly receive a lesser sentence than a man, all things being relatively equal.  It’s often referred to as “The Female Sentencing Discount.”

It’s wrong.  It’s sad.  It needs constant exposure.  It needs to stop.

For the full article: Missing Kitittas Boys Found Safe in Nevada


MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES