More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Archive: July 2009

Mom Kidnaps Children, Flees, is Caught - No Arrest, No Charges.

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

Another in what is sure to be a long line of stories we post regarding the bias against fathers in family court situations, I offer you the case of the missing Norris children, Parker and Preston - aged 2 and 3.

Their boys’ 27-year old mother, Nicole Butcher, allegedly kidnaps the children and flees their home area of Kitittas, Washington.  She does not have custody of the children.  She allegedly also left a suicide note and authorities were quick to put forth the excuse that “she is suicidal” after their discovery and apprehension in Nevada.

From the article:

Investigators said Butcher was not placed under arrest because the situation has more domestic implications than criminal ones.

This may be surprising to some, but it’s not to me if you look for and read enough stories.  The media and the authorities, across a broad range of topics, lean heavily towards finding excuses and justifications for women’s crimes & associated sentencing.  It’s in civil matters.  It’s in criminal matters.  And it’s not a secret that it’s a huge problem in family court.

In this case, a mother who appears not to have custody of the children, kidnaps and flees the state.  Soon after their discovery, are there any local arrests?  No.  Are there any Federal arrests for kidnapping and fleeing across state lines?  Nope.  Is there excuse-making and justification for the mother’s actions?  There sure are and it’s not uncommon, either.

Forgive my apparent lack of sympathy, but the reality is that if the gender roles were reversed and this situation involved a father who kidnapped his children (sans custody rights) and left behind a menacing note threatening harm to self or others - there would be no sympathetic reporter writing a story.  There would be no sympathetic federal, state, and/or local authorities expressing concern of the mental stability of the father to justify not arresting him and charging him with kidnapping.

His ass would be in jail.  End of story.

Not a mother, though.  Too often there is some kind of excuse or justification for their criminal action which, if they even garner arrest and charges… assuming a successful prosecution, the female will most certainly receive a lesser sentence than a man, all things being relatively equal.  It’s often referred to as “The Female Sentencing Discount.”

It’s wrong.  It’s sad.  It needs constant exposure.  It needs to stop.

For the full article: Missing Kitittas Boys Found Safe in Nevada

Best Interests of - The Money! Dad’s Parental Rights to be Restored!

Because he’s dead and people want his money!  HOORAAAAAAAAAAAYYY!!! Not.

In Broward County, Florida - an un-named father dies when he is struck by a car.  This father was stripped of his parental rights to his daughter, and perhaps rightly so as he was allegedly a serious drug addict.  That is not what is important in this story.

In death, the courts are considering restoring his parental rights!  Amazing as that sounds, that’s not even the issue.

What is at issue is how a story like this exemplifies what is truly at the root of the manipulations by the family court systems throughout this country as well as how the mainstream media tends to accentuate vilifying a father while shielding the mother who is guilty (in this case) of the same thing as dad.    Bottom line - It’s all about the money!

From the article:

In life, he was a lousy father.

His love for the crack pipe was mightier than the love for his children, a Broward judge decided, and ended his parental rights to his pre-teen daughter….

That’s a tragedy and a shame.  What’s abundantly clear from this article, if you read carefully enough, is that the mother was a drug addict, too!  That only gets a passing mention much later in the article.  However, dumping on dad as quoted above is what opens the article.

Dad appealed the ruling that stripped him of his parental rights.  However, before the case could be heard, he met with his untimely and tragic death.

From the article:

In a case believed to be a first in Florida, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in West Palm Beach has ordered Broward Circuit Judge John Frusciante to reconsider his order ending C.A.’s rights as a father. Perhaps, the court says, it is in the girl’s “best interests” to retain a relationship with C.A. now that he is dead.

At stake: perhaps a large sum of money. If the girl — who is not named in the appeals court decision — has no legal ties to her father, she would have no right to claim any proceeds from a wrongful-death lawsuit that may be filed by her father’s estate, the opinion says.

In a previous post:  BIOTCH! I do a brief about how disgusted I am at the grotesque use of the term “Best Interests of the Children” as both a sword and a shield to justify some of the most callous things I see, hear, and read about regarding family court.

One need not be a genius to realize that this has less to do with the BIOTCH, and everything to do with the money.  There is little question that the courts wouldn’t be reconsidering restoring the parental rights to a DEAD MAN if there wasn’t the possibility of there to be money made off of the deal.

“We must not forget that the overriding concern in [cases involving the termination of a parent's rights] is for the best interests of the child, not the parents,” the opinion states.   “The state initiates [termination] proceedings, not to punish parents who fail to met their obligations to the child, but to protect the child and her interests.”

And if there is money to be made, well, we’ll give the dead father back his parental rights.  Another example of the state using BIOTCH to shield themselves from rather well-deserved criticism for what amounts to restoring dad’s rights to gain access to the money that could be made from his death.

First - the girl probably won’t see the lion’s share of any money that may be forthcoming as the state will undoubtedly want to take large chunks of it to “reimburse” themselves for the costs of taking the children away from the parents in the first place.

Second - I wonder, assuming CASH is in the “best interests of the children,” had dad hit the lottery for many millions, would they would have restored his parental rights?  I can’t answer that question, maybe they would have if it meant they could profit from it.  At least now, with Dad being dead, they can get to his cash without him being able to defend himself - not that he would have been able to defend himself from Family Court money grabs if he were alive.

Finally, I doubt you’ll see this dead father’s rights restored one MINUTE before his estate files the wrongful death suit.  Sicker would be if they withhold restoring his rights until after a judgment has been secured on the potential suit.  If there is no money to be had, there is no purpose to restoring dead-dad’s rights.  In fact, I’d be willing to bet that the system is too stupid to do so regardless, even just to avoid appearing to be doing this solely for the money.

The estate’s attorney should immediately move to withdraw this man’s appeal.

Read the full article here:  In Death, Broward Father May Become Dad Again

Big Confrontations (Part 4): Conclusion

After the events leading up to Parts 2 and 3, the Psycho Family Phone Threats…. I held my ground and I stood firm on not bending to the crazy emails, the family phone threats, her threats regarding litigation, my being in contempt… I waded through her desperate phone calls to the Sheriff’s Department… and stayed the course.

Nothing was going to make me change my mind.  In order to make it more convenient for her vacation with the children, I flexed and moved up the exchange date 2-days.  She suggested coming down to our place to see where the kids were living while with us.  I accepted and made arrangements accordingly.

And, after all of the drama, threats, calls to authorities - she came down and was on-time for the child exchange.  However, given the dramatic concerns over her “safety,” she would not come to the home, so we ended up meeting at a local market a few miles from the home.  How sad.  She also came down with what I guess was her bodyguard - Psycho-SIL.  They did so in the dreaded “piece of shit car that probably won’t make it.”  That same car that had no problems going anywhere at anytime while I was the primary driver.  That same piece-of-shit that always seemed to drive long distances when it was something she really wanted to do, but never seemed to be road-worthy when it came time to meet for exchanges or come down to see where the kids were living.  The “piece-of-shit” defense was one used to dodge responsibilities or anything else that went against what she wanted to do or believed she was obligated to do.  This was true even when ordered to do so.

Interestingly enough, our interaction was minimal.  In fact, it was as if none of the drama previously detailed ever even took place.  We met, the boys moved from one vehicle to the other, and they were off.

A rather anti-climactic conclusion, at least, if you actually call this the conclusion.  I would pay a price for standing my ground when it would come time for my vacation with the children that was slated to start the following weekend in July of 2005.

(By the way… the “piece of shit” made it all the way here, all the way back, all the way to her parents beach home, all the way back to her house, and everywhere else she went until she got rid of it.  I’m willing to be it is out there somewhere rolling up the miles even today.)

Borderline Personality Types: Understanding Them

Excepts of this post are from the book about Borderline Personality Disorder, Understanding The Borderline Mother, by Dr. Christine Lawson. In it, she describes four typical roles that often define the BPD:

  • Waif
  • Hermit
  • Queen
  • Witch

The Waif is the helpless BPD.  She lives in intense emotional chaos and forms deeply enmeshed relationships with others who they’re hoping will manage their emotions on their behalf.  She turns to addictive behaviors to self-soothe and lives in a permanent pattern of panic attacks and suicidal episodes.  These are both expressions of their pain and a way to attract soothing, sympathetic attention from others.

The Hermit is the fearful BPD. She lives in total fear and refuses any kind of assistance or intervention.  She refuses to acknowledge any mistakes.  She isolates herself, is perpetually negative, and and tends to be obsessed with control, something of which they have very little.

The Queen is the controlling and entitled BPD.  She considers herself the ultimate authority and completely entitled, as if she were some kind of “Queen of the Imaginary Castle.”  She is demanding, intimidating, and viciously vindictive.  She refuses any kind of acceptance of responsibility or consequences because, of course, they have no faults and make no mistakes. The can front as alternately charming along with any one or more of the aforementioned characteristics.

The Witch is the sadistic BPD.  She is the ultimate in intimidating.  She uses rage, emotional control, and/or physical violence rather than charm.  She thinks everyone is out to get them no matter the circumstances or situation.  She is highly motivated by fear and suspicion.  She seeks to bolster her self-esteem and the illusion of power at the expense of others.

It takes a different approach to handle the type of borderline with which you’re dealing.

Dealing with the Waif requires you to avoid getting pulled into her crises.  You must avoid feeding her complete sense of victimization.  They will prey on your good nature and tendency to want to “rescue” or “save” them from whatever their latest issue is. The Waif lives off of these characteristics of the non-BPD and if you fail to avoid these mistakes, you will find yourself in a never-ending cycle of “rescues.”

With the Hermit, you must avoid internalizing their fears.  Doing so only perpetuates fear and avoidance on the part of the Hermit.  It will actually escalate their characteristics.  Additionally, by acquiescing to their fears and self-limiting behavior, it won’t be long before you find your life marked by the same outcomes.  You will stop seeing friends.  You will stop doing activities and hobbies.   You will become a hermit by default.

The Queen should not be permitted to gain the “upper hand” on you.  Anything the Queen does for you that is seemingly beneficial is coming to you with strings attached.  There is an expectation for something in return for being the recipient of her graciousness. Maximum entitlement for the Queen at maximum cost to you is what drives this BPD.

With the Witch comes your greatest risk of being a victim of domestic violence.  It is a wise person who avoids being left alone for extended periods of time with the Witch, if at all.  The Witch employs maximum destruction on your emotional well-being and potentially - your physical safety (and those around you, including your children).  Distance is the key to dealing with the Witch BPD.

Other coping strategies including:

The “Firm but Sensitive” Approach - Personal validation, important in any situation, is essential with a borderline parent. Express your awareness of their emotions even while setting boundaries.

Trust In Yourself - Many children of borderline parents indicate that they felt “crazy” growing up. They experience a childhood full of inconsistencies.  An action or statement that earned praise one day would spark a days-long silent treatment and/or rage the next day.  Additionally, sudden outbursts and overreactions are the norm.   Children growing in such an environment never learn to trust their own judgments or feelings.  Know that you weren’t crazy, that you’re not crazy, and that you’re not alone!

Trust In Others - People who’ve navigated through childhood with a borderline parent often suffer from feelings of worthlessness, fears of abandonment, and fears of people (generally) because they grew up receiving the mixed-message: You’re a wonderful person (one day)… You’re a horrible person (the next day).  The child has grown to expect that someone that they love or trust implicitly could turn on them at any given moment.

Defending Boundaries - Children of borderline parents are often forced to act as the parent themselves.  Given that the BPD’s mental and intellectual growth is considered stunted to about the age of 8 - 12 years old (in some circles), it’s as though a child is raising a child.  Therefore,  children of the borderline mother often grow up very quickly.  They often become caretaker of siblings and even end up acting as caretaker for everyone.  This will occur at the expense of taking care of themselves and they grow up missing out on a great many of the “normal things/experiences” that children should have.   Learn to put yourself first.

We often highly recommend that a person who is dealing with (or has dealt with) a BPD in their lives seek counseling/therapy for themselves.  Not only will this enable you to understand the BPD better, but it will help you in getting over those parts of your personality that may have developed as a result, putting you at greater risk of poor interpersonal relationships as you have grown into adulthood.

Big Confrontations (Part 3): Sister-In-Law Phone Harassment

In order to continue from Part II - Big Confrontations, we had to do some serious editing of Psycho-SIL’s voice mail.  She used a lot of names and places and maybe some day, I’ll actually learn how to use the software to edit things like these a lot better.  In the meantime, we again apologize for the sound quality, but I assure you, it’s dramatically improved.  Keep in mind, this voice mail went from… the Voice Mail… to a cassette tape… to a digital voice recorder… to the computer.  Needless to say, the level of hiss that once existed would have made it completely unlistenable.

In today’s Part III, you get the voice mail from Psycho-SIL. Hers was the first of two calls from the family.  Accompanying the sound file is a transcript of the call. Again , I chose to edit out names and places to protect the innocent and the guilty. Those edits are in brackets in the transcript. Following along should make “hearing” everything that is said much, much easier, but not as easy as the last offering.  She had 20+ edits while Psycho-FIL’s had less than 10.

TRANSCRIPT:

Hey [LM], it’s [Alcoholic SIL], I just talked to my sister. I heard she spoke to [DW] yesterday. Umm, in my email of a couple months ago remember where I said I was going to, ummm, intervene if [PEW] got in over her head trying to deal with you. Umm, I spoke to my parents and we’re gonna be hiring a first-class attorney, umm, and apparently [DW] said that if [PEW] didn’t drive 10-hours down there to pick up the boys, which [Gloria Evaluator] said was unreasonable for you to ask her to do, especially on a holiday weekend, umm, if the boys aren’t returned by you, this holiday weekend Saturday, we’ll be getting the District Attorney to get the State Troopers to come down there and pick the boys up, okay? So, tell [DW], first of all, don’t ever talk to my sister again, okay, first of all, and second of all, if the boys aren’t returned this Saturday, by you, okay, there is gonna be serious consequences. We’re gonna alert [Gloria Evaluator] of all the things that [DW] said, especially about what are we going to do about [PEW] and see if she can get that into an addendum to her report and all the purported things that you said that she said so far ummm, and, again, we’re hiring an attorney, an AV-rated attorney that I’ve researched and is very well known in [Partagas]. And again, my father has already taken, err, spoken to the District Attorney er, in uh, [Bolivar] County and [Partagas] and have the State Troopers umm, come down and get the boys if you’re not gonna escort them up because that’s a violation of the agreement that you and [PEW] worked out in good faith. [Gloria Evaluator] said it’s not [PEW’s] responsibility since you moved out of state. And [DW] has no responsibilities to be discussing anything with [PEW] and I do not appreciate her talking to my sister like this. Okay, and I hope you’re taping this because it’s a good thing! umm again, I want this on record because, I cannot believe that you would have the boys listening to this and don’t even say that the boys weren’t in the room or within hearing of this conversation, you two bantering back and forth giving my sister mothering tips. Umm, it’s easy to move out of state and, uhh, be a Monday night quarterback about what’s been going on when you move off into a new state and, umm, start a new life, okay, and leave the wreckage for [PEW] to deal with, okay? Ummm, tell [PEW] when she can expect you to drop the boys off, ummm, either up at her house or the shore or let us know, ummm, you know, if the State Troopers will be coming to pick them up. Thank you very much.

CLICK HERE TO PLAY THE PODCAST OF HER VOICE-MAIL:

 
icon for podpress  Psycho-SIL VM as an MP3: Play Now | Play in Popup | Download

Some thoughts (again)…

  • Who cares if you hire a really good attorney?  You were going to anyway.  Given all of the litigation that had taken place to that point already, did she honestly think that the threat of MORE litigation was a good motivational tool? That attorney actually lost her custody time as I went from every other weekend to every other week after he came on board. Guess he wasn’t that great after all.
  • Nearly everything else claimed was fictional, starting with her/PEW’s contention that Gloria said any such thing about the travel time.  The only thing Gloria spoke of regarding our respective vacations was surprise that we had (at the time of the discussion) worked it out without any problems..
  • DW wouldn’t have talked to her sister… IF HER SISTER HADN’T CALLED THE HOUSE AND ASKED TO SPEAK WITH HER!
  • Gloria never said sharing travel wasn’t PEW’s responsibility.  You’ll see, in her recommendation (future post) that she recommended an increase in PEW’s travel sharing responsibilities.
  • The only parenting tips that either of us offered PEW was to stop making the children want to come home by promising them toys, animals, presents, etc. when they were with me during my parenting time.
  • It’s “arm-chair quarterback” and not “Monday night quarterback,” you drunken slob.
  • She sounds drunk.
  • She certainly doesn’t sound like she knew what she was going to say when she picked up the phone between the stuttering, the “ummmms and ahhhhs,” the long uncomfortable pauses, and non-sensical jibberish that she put forth.
  • Her sister initiates a divorce and a barrage of litigation… and the “wreckage” is my fault.  Only in a sick, twisted, warped family’s mind is that true.

The Conclusion to come…




MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES