More About Me...

The Psycho Ex Wife is the true account of a marriage, divorce, and subsequent custody fight between a loving man, his terroristic ex-wife who we suspect suffers from Borderline Personality Disorder (at least from our armchair psychologist diagnosis), and the husband's new partner. We are not simply anti-mother or pro-father ... Read more

Why Talk About It...

The site is intended to help people in similar situations. I have always felt like no one really knew or quite understood the level of chaos that had existed in my life, and this is a way to express it all without burdening personal friends and family with such horrors ... Read More

Archive: March 2009

Parental Alienation Awareness Day: April 25th, 2009

Have your own psycho ex? Get a FREE Report on "Why Co-Parenting Doesn't Work", or learn how to win child custody with a custody coach.

From a reader, HG:

Hello,

I am a reader of your blog, and I was hoping I could enlist your assistance for my cause. I am going to be petitioning the Governor of my state, Virginia, to proclaim April 25th Parental Alienation Awareness Day, and I have started a petition in support of the proclamation. I am trying to get as many signatures as possible, especially Virginians - but I am having a really hard time. (Which, I guess, is why awareness is so important!)

I am hoping that you might see fit to make your readers aware of the petition.  If you would like to sign, or post the link, the petition can be found here:

Petition to have Parental Alienation Awareness Day recognized in Virginia

Thank you - and keep writing! Your blog has been a huge help to my husband and I. Especially the low/no contact.

~HG

Let’s help HG see her project through to successful recognition by officials in the state of Virginia. Sign the petition.

Last year, we here at thepsychoexwife, shined a spotlight on Parental Alienation Awareness Day 2008. Many, many readers submitted their own experiences with parental alienation. Some involved their offspring. Some were children of alienators.  On April 25, 2008 - we posted a story approximately every 30-minutes for 24-hours.  It was tough, because I was using software that didn’t allow me to schedule posts… so DW and I split up our sleep times and post times to make sure we honored our commitment.

They were all heartbreaking stories that were shared in an effort to make sure that spotlight shined bright!  I thank again all those who found the strength to share their story.

This year, we would like to do something very similar… only without the specific time interval!  So, if you have a story that you would like to share, send it to us.  As always, names will be changed to protect both the innocent and the guilty.  The important part of this exercise is to share the story and show the world that parental alienation exists… it hurts children and parents… and needs to be accounted for in court, as we’ve seen occurring more and more in the news, not just in the United States but beyond, too!

Visit the Parental Alienation Awareness Day Organization Website for events in your town, your city, your state, your country!  If you are sending a submission to us for posting on April 25th, 2009 - please include “PAS STORY” in the subject line… and thank you for even considering doing so.  Spread the word.

Early Counseling Efforts with the Children

Continuing through 2005, we move from January to February. At the time, we finally agreed to counseling for the boys, then 6 and 3. I was initially resistant due to my belief that PEW would find a way to use it to further her false accusations and get someone else on “her side.” Yes, very paranoid of me. Hardly unexpected (if I do say so myself) given the shock to my system from the first custody evaluation.  Counseling was helpful at that time and it was my hope to use it to help with the transition, given the decision to take a new job and move nearly 4-hours away as discussed in the “Decisions, Decisions” post.

While I continue to strive to be better and keeping the communication with PEW to a minimum and only when necessary, I still need a “vent” outlet. So my family, for the time being, is stuck with my desire to gather my thoughts for possible future use.

Below is an email she sent to her attorney in response to my initial objections regarding counseling for the children.  It’s a “cut & paste” from a post-email vent I had with my family, which essentially gives my thoughts on her crazy email to her attorney (#1) and for some reason, copied me.

The Preface:

The following “carroted” parts are an email that PEW sent to her attorney, I’m guessing in reply to my refusal to sign a consent for S1 to go to counseling (without certain conditions being met) as I don’t believe that S1 is in need of counseling, I believe PEW is in need of some brushing up on her parenting skills, particularly in the discipline and consistency arena. My replies are ONLY to you and me, in case I need them for court or to articulate them to [my attorney] when we discuss the matter further.

My main concern… again, her agitation, embellishments, and flat-out lies are getting more frequent and more outlandish… why she copied me on this ridiculousness, I’ll never know…

To: PEW Attorney1

Over the weekend I received a copy of the letter from [LM's attorney's] office, dated Jan.21st 2005.

The letter states: “PEW had indicated approximately two years ago that she felt young S1needed counseling for some reason. LM did not see the need for this; however, he went along with her wishes. Young S1 was seen by a therapiest who confirmed that the young man did not need any counseling. The therapist did give PEW some suggestions to help her with the child. Again, LM does not feel that his son needs counseling and believes the problem lies with PEW.”

True… this is pretty much what I told my attorney to write back.

It is important to respond to this because this information is not accurate. After the birth of my son S2, S1 had a very difficult time adjusting to having a new brother. He hit S2 in the head the day after we brought him home from the hospital. I could not leave him alone with the baby at all.

Case and point… she would leave a 2-1/2 year old alone with an infant. Let it be known that S1 didn’t exhibit these alleged behaviors when I was home. At least, nothing beyond what could reasonably be expected from a 2-1/2 year old with a new brother in the house. Curiosity mostly.

One week after we brought him home S1 dumped him out of his bouncy seat. At that time I asked LM if I could take S1 to see a counselor to help me, help him with the transition. LM refused. It wasn’t until S2 was almost a year old that LM allowed me to take him to see a counselor.

I don’t recall it being a year, but that points is immaterial. My concern is in the day of “every child has ADD or ADHD” - I was worried about a quick diagnosis and medication for the toddler. Shortly after first refusing, I agreed to allow S1 to see a counselor with the understanding that regardless of what the counselor said, I would not agree to any medication of him.

The counselor gave me many helpful interventions for dealing with S1s aggression towards the baby.

This is what I find somewhat humorous. She’s taking exception to what I wrote, and then supporting it with her diatribe. The counseler gave HER suggestions on how to deal with S1. Didn’t give S1 suggestions. Didn’t diagnose him with any condition. He essentially gave her ideas regarding how to be more effective disciplining S1 (given her descriptions of what was apparently going on during her watch) and informed her to be consistent with what she was suggesting. Pretty much exactly what I told my attorney.

The counselor also said that if I was unsuccessful with this then she would suggest further counseling for S1. Her opinion was that S1’s personality makes it more difficult for him to deal with change. He is an intense child and very intelligent child.

As I said… the counselor found nothing “wrong” with S1. The counselor taught PEW how to deal with a child who has a new sibling in the house… again, with the understanding that the frequency and severity of claims PEW has made didn’t occur when I was present. Given the level of her embellishments and fabrications, I still suspect that her claims are probably grossly overstated.

If LM would like a more detailed report of this, he can contact [Guidance Center], where S1 was seen. With the help of this counselor I was able to deal with S1’s aggression towards his baby brother and now he plays very nicely with S2 and we have very little problems with physical aggesssion.

Again, she supports precisely what I told my attorney. The counselor gave her information on how to parent S1. With the counselor’s help “I was able to deal with S1s aggression…” - she clearly is indicating that she was unable to deal with it. I believe that’s my contention then, and it remains my contention now.

Further, her last sentence contradicts the reasons she is giving for wanting him to see a counselor now.

Again, we are making a very difficult transition as a family and it is indicated by S1’s behavior that he is having difficulty.

I reiterate… he is not having difficulty when he is in my custody. Plus, in the same email, she says he is doing “very nicely” with S2.

Every weekend for the past 10 weeks young S1 and LM have been reporting that S1 has been vomiting while in LM’s custody.

This is a complete fabrication. He was delivered to me with an ear infection the weekend of 1/7, which accounts for his fever and vomiting, so said the doctor. The only other time he got sick was this past Saturday night, when he had an upset stomach in the middle of the night. No fever, no other symptoms. Tossed-up something that didn’t agree with him and was fine all day Sunday and this morning. Going back to before Christmas, I don’t recall him being sick at all in December, and certainly not when he was in my custody Christmas weekend (as [Bro2] and company would attest given that were at his house Christmas Eve). Christmas Day Evening and Sunday, the boys were perfectly healthy. After the 27th, I didn’t have them again until 1/5. During that period of time, S2 suffered a ruptured ear-drum (while on her watch) on New Year’s Day (or perhaps it was the 2nd). He didn’t have an ear infection when I had them last on the 27th (not that I would dream of “blaming” her for an ear infection). The weekend of the 7th was S1’s ear infection. I had them on the 17th… they were fine. I had them the weekend of the 21st, they were fine. I had them the 27th thru this morning, and other than S1’s illness Saturday night… they were fine.

Where she comes up with “10-consecutive weekends of illness” defies explanation, and also supports my concerns that she is trying to set something up, but what I’m unsure.

He also displays alot of hostility towards me during the first day he is back with me. I want to take S1 to see someone so that they can help me….again, help him.

Again, the implication here is clear, but know this… I’m the one she calls when the boys are unruly in her custody. She called me when I was away for [cousin's] wedding because she couldn’t handle the children, but again, that’s not the first time nor will it be the last. The problem is clear, PEW’s desire to not have the children “dislike her” leads to inconsistency and a lack of discipline on her part. Then, when they get out of control for her, she wants to find a way to put the blame on me. Clearly, from the prior stint in counseling for S1 in which her contention was that HE had a problem… the counselor’s guidance was clear, PEW needed to do some things to prevent from happening, those things she said were happening.

PEWAttorney1, Please make a note of this because I think we are going to be having an issue with getting my son to counseling. Even though LM said he would consent after he saw the letter from the Doctor, he has just informed me that, first he needs to speak to the Dr. and needs to be convinced that it is necessary.

I told my attorney that when I saw a letter that explained what the DOCTOR saw and what the BASIS was for the DOCTOR’S recommendation for counseling for S1… I would CONSIDER signing a consent. The reason I informed my attorney that was my position was due to the fact that I believe that PEW is making the assessment and that the Doctor will give a child’s parent whatever letter they request.

Referring back to his attorney’s letter, included in the “for some reason” I felt Young S1 needed counseling should be the fact that a few months before S2’s birth little S1 witnessed his father choking me and then ripping the phone out of the wall, so that I could not contact the police.

Fabrication. Just a flat-out lie that continues to grow with more new details every time she tells it.

Anyway… I simply called my attorney, told him to expect to see this… and that we need to take further action. Between the allegations that I was kidnapping the children this weekend to the ongoing story-telling, I think we need to figure out how to get this crap before a judge and get her a psychiatric evaluation somehow.

———-

2005 would prove to be a really, really rough year.  Not that any of the rest weren’t - but you’ll see the posturing, the threats, the harassment, the custodial interference, her family’s ongoing involvement, parental alienation…  all come together pretty viciously over the course of the next few months in ‘05.

Help for Male Victims of Domestic Violence

For the first time ever, male survivors of domestic abuse will now be offered a peer led, 12-week support group online, making support available from the comforts of home!

Since 2000 the Domestic Abuse Helpline for Men and Women (DAHMW) has been offering support services to abuse survivors through its nationally available toll-free helpline. This year DAHMW will offer a virtual support group to male victims of abusive women. Participants will use virtual cameras to attend online meeting groups at a given time every week for 12 weeks.

“Over the years we have received numerous requests for this type of service from our male helpline callers,” said Jan Brown director and founder of DAHMW. “We are thrilled to be one of the first to offer this vital and needed service to male survivors of domestic abuse.”

This support group will give participants an opportunity to understand the effects of abuse on themselves and their children, explore what healthy intimate relationships look like, and help them to achieve personal growth in all areas of their life.

Currently, the virtual support group is designed for male victims who have been in an abusive relationship with a female partner. To participate in the online support group, victims must be removed from the abusive partner for at least a month. Participants must have access to a computer and high-speed Internet service. DAHMW will supply the camera.

To find out more about this program, please contact DAHMW via email at dahmwagency@gmail.com or call 207-683-5758.

—————–

I wish I had available then… this program shows significant promise and is tailored specifically for men.  If you or someone you love is suffering or has suffered domestic abuse at the hands of their partner, please suggest that they give this program a try.  Get the help you need.  Get the help you deserve.

—————–

I’ve promoted some of DAHMW’s intiatives here on thepsychoexwife.com before, including:

The Children’s Physicals

As a follow-up to the annual debate between the PEW and I regarding proper health and nutrition for the children, most recently resulting in the information detailed in the “Food Deprivation” series, I took the boys to the pediatrician.  They were due for their physicals and another shot anyway.

They’re doing great.  Eyes good.  BP good.  Pretty much everything checked out very well.  This is great.  They knew in advance my concerns regarding their weight, S1 in particular.  I soft-shoed the issue regarding the opposition from PEW, detailing what I was doing in terms of educating them on proper portions, chewing properly, not eating fast, as well as how to go about assisting with making some better choices in terms of the types and amounts of food that they eat.

S1 and S2 were very forthright in detailing how “we’ve always been doing good at dad’s house” and described the variety of foods that we eat and those we work to avoid.  They also spoke about how “it’s at moms where we need the help about foods and snacking and stuff.”

I took that opportunity to say, in a most diplomatic way, “We’re trying to work together with Mom so that everyone is on the same page.  She is aware of the issues and is changing some things on her end.” I thought that was fair to say, especially in front of the kids.

I was disappointed, if not surprised, that S1’s weight at 5′2″ tall is 165-pounds! That’s 35-pounds MORE than the highest weight recommendation for his height. So, I reviewed the records that the doctor had regarding S1’s weight dating back to 2004ish and have meshed them with the notes I have for those few times S1 was weighed on a doctor’s scale when with me.  (Though I asked for S2’s, that is less of a concern at this point as he is mostly height and weight proportionate at 4′1″ and 74-pounds.  It took a while for them just to review the records back that far with S1).

The doctor and assistant were very informative and proud of the boys’ knowledge and attention to the situation and were extremely encouraging to them.  You could see in their faces the pride.  I was pleased in that everything that the doctor and assistant were saying - was exactly what I have been saying.  Of course, that is because I learned it from them in addition to my own independent research.

PEW and I split in early 2004.  Here is the timeline and weightline with some added notes at important points to demonstrate the changes along the last 5-years.  (Italics is when I weighed him, standard is doctor notes.)

  • February 2004, just before the split: approximately 60-pounds at 5-1/2 years old.
  • Summer 2004, post-split: 77-pounds.  Custody at this point was still about 50/50, but if you’ve reviewed the history on this topic, over-snacking multiple times during the day was already an issue.
  • September 2004: 80-pounds.  After November, I was relegated to non-custodial status.
  • January 10, 2005: 86-pounds.
  • January 20, 2005: 87-pounds.  It was at this time that I asked that this be addressed with the pediatrician.  He made recommendations and suggested we visit a pediatric dietician.  That never happened.
  • Fall 2005: 102-pounds.
  • February 2006: 107-pounds.
  • June 2006: 110-pounds.  I had him the larger percentage of that summer.  He went home at 108-pounds when I weighed him in August.  He was back to mom as primary custodian in September.
  • November 2006:  124-pounds.  In two-months with mom, he added 16-pounds.
  • June 1, 2007: 147-pounds.  I had them as primary custodian, except for 2-weeks that summer.
  • July 20, 2007: 131-pounds.
  • August 24, 2007:  130-pounds.  He went home to mom again as primary custodian.
  • September 24, 2007:  140-pounds.
  • November 29, 2007:  155-pounds.  That was right around the time I managed to regain 50/50 custody.
  • March 24, 2009:  165-pounds.

The two periods where S1 maintained his weight or lost weight - was when he was with me as a primary custodian (summers)… 2007 being a pretty substantial weight loss when he was with me almost exclusively for almost 3-months.  I’ve already detailed how we didn’t change anything with regards to food during those times.  The 2007 “shed” was due almost entirely to the incredible amount of activity that they were involved in - most of it the Swim Team activities where the children practiced 4-nights per week for 2-hours and had a meet every weekend.  This was in addition to summer camp AND the running around they did when they were home.  Throw in normal meals and better snack choices - and it’s abundantly clear why he went home looking and feeling better than he ever has.

Also noticeable - the substantial ensuing weight-gains when returned to their mother.

Obviously, 50/50 custody isn’t having the impact that I would like, but you can see from the details in the recent back-and-forth with PEW and my discussions with the boys, it seems the more steps I take to educate them and work with them on nutrition and fitness - the further in the opposite direction she goes.  This is not unusual with the psycho ex-wife.

We received the “proper portions” place-mats we ordered this past week.  The boys think they’re “so cool”  and now they sit right there at their spots on the table.  The extra 2 we have, despite the fact that I think they’re cool, too, and want them for my place and DW’s place at the table… we’re going to send to PEW’s with the boys.  No, it’s not to antagonize PEW.  It’s to keep this in the boys’ mind and perhaps initiate some changes on her part.  My guess, she’ll spazz and send us some scathing email about me obsessing about food & weight.

We’ll keep trying and hope that someday, she decides to recognize the she overfeeds them and over-snacks them and makes changes.  We’ll hope that one day she’ll start buying and preparing better meals for them.  We’ll hope that one day she encourages a little more activity out of them, even if it’s simply going for a good walk 3 or 4 times per week for 30-minutes.

Hope.  It’s pretty much all we have on this issue.

2005: Decisions, Decisions

As most readers know, I’m trying to close the gap between the history and the current events.  The last post I had for 2005 was offering the 2005 Journal post, dropping some of the events of that time in place so that I could get to the discussion of the difficult time and difficult decisions I made given the circumstances at the time.  You can read the history by clicking on the year labels on the right hand side of the blog if you want to review the overall chronology of events.  All of 2005 can be found, for instance, by clicking on: 2005 Label.

Faced with depleted resources, a grossly unfavorable custody evaluation, threats of an increase in child support, the sale of the marital home with no meaningful options for a place to live (due to limited funds)… I was under tremendous pressure from every side to get my life situation in order.

Late in January 2005, I received a call from a guy with whom I had previous interaction on a project at the job I then had.  He was a project manager for something my company was working on several years earlier.

This is where my story becomes completely implausible for pretty much everyone.  Friends, family, the judge, PEW - everyone.  This, I understand completely.  Still, it is the truth.

This contact, we’ll call him “Larry,” was the Vice President of the company that I would soon join, leaving my job of 11-years at the time.  Larry was leaving the company and they were in the midst of a project that I happened to be an “expert” in and he was wondering if I would consider applying to replace him.  While I wouldn’t be brought in as a VP, there was future opportunity for me to grow into that position over time, perhaps rather quickly.  I was intrigued and conflicted.  I would be coming in and taking a lot of his responsibility - primarily for this project which was critical to retaining business in the market that made up 100% of their business.  A huge opportunity.

What’s so implausible about that?

  1. The timing.
  2. The money.
  3. The fact that this business was located 5-minutes from where DW lived.

Obviously, all tied together and given the proximity to DW, this breaks the implausibility meter into a million pieces.  However, it’s the truth.

I had a great deal of success at the company I was working for at the time.  I always wanted to ascend to a VP position, but was stuck where I was.  Still, I was well-liked, well-respected, and counted on to get some tough things done for improving the company.  The pay was very good, but given what I was facing on the personal front and the difficult finding appropriate living arrangements that would work with the 11-days/month I had with the children (and living under threats of seeing that reduced further by PEW who was wielding the custody evaluator’s recommendations like an iron-mace) - I would look into the opportunity.

The new prospect offered me a “working interview.”  This was something I had never experienced before.  Essentially, they were going to pay me to work on-site for 3-days (very good money).  I would get to evaluate the company and they, in turn, would get to evaluate me.  So, I took 3 vacation days to do this.  It wouldn’t cost me much more than gas money because I could stay at DW’s place during this interview.  It would occur in early February of 2005.

The company was relatively new and profitable.  A division of a very large, German-owned company with a lot of resources.  They had just expanded the facility, doubling its size.  They appeared to have great, knowledgable employees, a solid senior management staff, and tremendous financial and technical backing from the parent company.

During negotiations, I did almost everything I could to make them not hire me.  I asked for $5,000 more than they initially offered me.  I asked them to give me health insurance immediately rather than waiting the 90-day probationary period.  I asked them for a specific amount in a raise which I required would be payable no later than 6-months if I met the objectives that we had discussed in that time-frame.  I asked them for 4-weeks vacation immediately instead of nothing for the first year.  I explained to them in too much detail my personal situation and the forthcoming known court dates for which I would have to leave work (2 or 3 at the time) and asked that it be put in writing that these absences would not be used against me during the review of my “probationary period.”  (One of those dates would be a mere 8 days after the date they wanted me to start.)  They had to agree to let me leave work at 4PM on Fridays every other week in order for me to exercise my parenting time, which would allow me to arrive at a reasonable hour to get the children.  Long-story shortened… they agreed to everything demand except they offered me 3-weeks vacation immediately instead of 4.  They wanted me to start immediately.

Before accepting the position, DW and I had lengthy discussions about what this would mean.  This potential advancement in our relationship was about to happen WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY faster than either of us anticipated.  Details on this were inconsequential, if I was going to take this position, I would be moving in with her.

My primary motivation for moving ahead and making such a significant change which would mean losing approximately 5-days per month with the boys - was financial.   I had a done a rather exhaustive financial analysis and there was just no way for me to come even close to making ends meet staying in custody-state with a $1,200+ child support figure staring me in the face.  At the height of the real estate boom, rent prices were out of control, too… and my minimal living options meant I would be losing those days with the kids anyway.  In the custody-state, even the unaffordable options I had available to me were 45-minutes or more away from where the kids were going to school… so 4-hours or 45-minutes had the same impact on my custody situation.  The only reason I had the 11-days I was afforded is because we lived about 10-minutes from one another, me in the marital home which PEW wouldn’t allow me to retain, and her in her new apartment.  However, splitting living expenses with DW in a locality that had a significantly lower standard of living meant I could meet the financial obligations that were about to be imposed on me in the form of child support, still be able to try and save money for their future and mine, and also grow my relationship with DW, who fully supported whichever decision I would ultimately make.

I felt up against the wall.  In less than three weeks I was to make settlement on the marital home and I had no place to live and the prospects in custody state weren’t very good.  I was going to be relegated to every-other-weekend dad (and hopefully some extra time in the summers, holidays, etc) regardless of where I lived and worked.

I accepted the position, telling the new company that I could start on March 1st, 2005 (about 3-weeks from the interview process) because I had loose ends to tie up and to get whatever crap I had left after trashing and downsizing the marital home moved down to DW’s place.   I couldn’t turn down the money and the possibility of accelerated advancement to a VP position - this opportunity meant that I could actually make ends-meet, avoid the punitive punishments associated with not being able to make the steep child support payments facing me, and then DW and I would figure out how to manage our lives and respective custody arrangements over several states and with one completely crazy psycho ex-wife.

Next update for 2005, when I get around to it, is the fallout from disclosing to PEW what was taking place.


MOSTCOMMENTS

BOOKLIST

OURCATEGORIES