Parental Advisory - This Post Contains Strong Language
If you're new here, you may want to get updates for FREE by Email or RSS. Thanks for visiting!
Well, it’s not like there haven’t been others, it just seemed like a catchy title!
PEW wasn’t always obvious about her fear of my saving all of these discussions, letters, emails, IMs, etc. - but I knew she was. It was difficult enough keeping her stories straight, but the prospect of having to explain her behavior that was documented in her own words had to be pretty intimidating. Her fail-safe has always been that she simply didn’t write any of it. I fabricated it.
I had two AIM IDs… one for work to communicate with colleagues at facilities in various parts of the U.S. as well as Europe and Asia… and one I just used at home to show those in my list that I wasn’t at work.
In this short exchange from April 4, 2004, PEW logs-in as me using my “at home” AIM ID, which I must have left the password saved on the sign-in page. Despite the content, when I happened upon this, it made me laugh in its absurdity.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: Hi I’m LM!
LM, ACTUALLY: Hi.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: I can say whatever I want to myself
LM, ACTUALLY: Super. Is there a purpose to this?
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: yeah, the purpose is to prove that whatever crap you made up “as me”……on aim……is “made up” that’s the purpose. you could sign on as me from work if you wanted and have a little chat with yourself
LM, ACTUALLY: And how is that possible unless I have two AIMS open on the same PC… which is not possible?
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: your just the kind of sicko who would do that. how many pc’s do they have at work?
LM, ACTUALLY: Lots.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: right. your stacks….of conversations…..they are a farce….. you know it….i know it and I can prove it
LM, ACTUALLY: So you’re saying that your claim would be that you, PEW, did not in fact type all of that stuff to me, but that I ran around work, typing messages back and forth to myself during work time?
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: who said this is PEW? this is LM. LM, the big asshole
LM, ACTUALLY: Did it ever occur to you that the servers at AOL would be able to tell differently?
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: i am LM the asshole. REALLY?
LM, ACTUALLY: IP address logs. Then you would have to explain to the court how I was at work and at home at the same time.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: maybe it was one of your brothers
LM, ACTUALLY: You know… “setting up” these viperous discussions with myself.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: or homo boy MCB. he’d do anything for you
LM, ACTUALLY: I think I’m gonna call your father. Your behavior is really beginning to disturb me.
PEW, PRETENDING TO BE LM: thank God I kept those emails where MCB was saying he thought you were gay. you callin VAM? that’s my Dad. I’m LM. Goodbye asshole
How can you not laugh at the fact that she types as herself to answer some of my questions in an effort to demonstrate how I could have pulled off what she accuses me of?
The sad part of her delusion is that she really believes that much of what I had (and never shared with her) was orchestrated by me. Seriously. She even used that excuse in court in an attempt to avoid having much of them entered into evidence.
Honestly, one or two or a few conversations, it might be plausible. Did she really think that I sat back one day… some 4 or 5 years earlier… anticipated that she would divorce me… and then went on this half-decade campaign to fabricate more than 500 emails and instant-message conversations on the off chance that she would actually follow-through on her oft-repeated threat?
Did you really think that the answer to that question would be YES?!?!

July 9th, 2008 at 12:58 am
Sorry, I had to laugh out loud at how absolutely ludicrous this was. How did you resist calling the white coats on the spot?