Monday morning (5/5), I receive the following email from PEW:
LM,
I meant to ask the boys....particularly S2 about what Mr. Neighbor said to him outside yesterday. I'm not sure if he said anything to S1, but there was more arguing and fighting between the kids this weekend and I thought I heard Mr. Neighbor say to the boys that "you don't want Dad to get involved if you're messing with my kids" If he said what I think he said, I'm going to go ballistic on him. The kids argue and I generally just send them home and I don't get involved with the petty details of why they were fighting in the first place and they spend ALOT of time over here. So I was going to say, if you have a problem with my children you don't talk to them, you talk to me. I am so pissed off I wish I remembered to ask the boys about that. Can you see what they say to you about it?
~PEW
It's been a while since I spoke of her next-door neighbors. These are the ones with two boys the same age as ours. The older one, we'll call him "Joker" - is about as scary a boy of 9-years old can be. He's got "that look" in his eye that I didn't like the moment I first saw him. This is the kid with a toy-gun arsenal that would impress a branch of our armed-forces. The one who used to shoot me to death if he was outside and I was doing an exchange at her house (back when I had to do that). This is the kid who's father bought him several bb-guns. This same child has apparently shot S1 and S2 on several occasions, which I didn't find out until far too much time had passed to actually do anything about it. Their latest purchase for their scary oldest son - a cross-bow. A real, true to life, powerful and deadly cross-bow. Just what I needed to hear.
Long story shortened, I've given the boys practical advice regarding these two "friends." When they act up, go home. If you see the guns or the cross-bow leave the house - go home. Tell mom to call the police and insist that the police confiscate them.
This communication from PEW gave me the opportunity to discuss the matter with her. The email was followed by an early morning phone call and I called her back about 10:00AM to find out what the situation was. This was an "urgent matter pertaining to the children."
Apparently, all of the kids have been fighting and arguing incessantly for some time. Unsurprisingly, PEW doesn't know how to manage such situations. Some of the weekend highlights included:
- Finally breaking down and when the neighbor kids got out of control, told them to leave. "Joker" would not leave. Sat down, put his feet up on the table, and just stayed despite her repeated pleas to leave the house and get home.
- After said ejection, both boys, Joker and his younger brother we'll call "Goblin," began an incessant "knock-knock zoom-zoom" effort. (Ringing the door bell and running.)
- They created and held up graphic signs indicating the S1 and S2 should "suck their..."
- Apparently, her "wonderful neighbors" recently had a new baby and they don't spend a whole lot of time with the older two... not that I believed that they've been all that great at parenting them before the newborn. According to PEW, she allows them to run wild, and the first place they typically run is her house and "she doesn't know how to handle it."
- Joker and Goblin regularly barge into PEW's home uninvited, but according to the boys, she never really does anything about it and expects them to play with Joker and Goblin - even when they really don't want to.
- They dumped trash on her porch after being ejected.
Still, PEW did nothing except tell the boys to stop looking out the window. As she would tell it, by the time she was compelled to call next door, one or both parents had taken care of it.
So, without blaming her for history, I reminded her of my concerns regarding Joker and Goblin going way back. I expressed deep disappointment at the bb-gun incidents, but since it was water under the bridge, we would decide how to handle it going forward. We spoke of our mutual fear regarding the addition of a real-life cross-bow to Joker's aresenal.
What was the real purpose of her call? She wanted ME to call the neighbors and address the issues with them.
I told her that while I sympathized with her situation, there was simply no way I was going to get involved in her disagreements with her neighbors. That was her situation to handle and I would not be injecting myself into it unless something happened that warranted my intervention - and that intervention would involve the police. In the interim, it was her responsibility to address the situation with her neighbors. She even tried to play the "I'm a woman" card, telling me that she thinks that Mr. Neighbor (allegedly) said what he said because she's a woman and figured that there was no man there to challenge him. For that reason, I should come down there and do something about it. Well, Mr. Neighbor is about the size of a racehorse jockey and probably intimidates few. Further, PEW isn't the size of a racehorse jockey and could probably take him if it ever got physical. Her neighbors, her issue with which to deal.
My suggestions to her were as follows:
- If the children come over uninvited, ask them to leave once. Then call the parents to come retrieve their children and remind them to teach them respect for their neighbor's home.
- Call Mr. and Mrs. Neighbor and tell them their children are no longer welcome at your home for "a while." A month. The summer. I don't care. The boys don't like them. We all fear them. They're not welcome.
- Express your feelings regarding Joker being in possession of bb-guns and now a cross-bow.
- THE BIGGIE: If you or the children ever see the bb-guns or the cross-bow ever come out of your neighbor's house, call the police. I don't care if you have to LIE and tell the cops the child pointed it at you. Call the police, get them there, and insist that they confiscate the weapons.
- I told her AND more important, S1 and S2 - if they see those weapons again, they are to call me right away.
I didn't put any blame on her. I didn't tell her that this should have been addressed a long time ago. I simply made suggestions how she might want to handle things going forward, even if it meant the neighbors didn't like her. The boys deserve that protection from these two tyrants and their disinterested parents.
She listened and not for even an instant did she deviate from the discussion. She thanked me at the end of our conversation. Soon thereafter, I received the following email:
LM,
Thanks for letting me vent this morning. I spoke to Mrs. Neighbor and told her what I thought I heard. I told her I think the kids need to take a break from each other for a while. She was fine with that and agreed that they've been fighting alot. We'll see after a few weeks.
I agree with you about the crossbow. it's supposed to be put away unless he's supervised.
~PEW
I'm guessing she soft-shoed it, which isn't something I would have done, particularly given the history with the bb-guns and all the other outrageous behavior I've heard about from the boys. BUT... at least she took some action and hopefully the appearance of putting her foot down is a start.
My reply to the above:
PEW,
It was an urgent matter pertaining to the children. Given the stories I've heard, I'm concerned about their safety, particularly with regard to the bb-guns and now the cross-bow.
I pray that if you ever see them out in the open with those weapons, you'll call the police. Joker clearly cannot handle such responsibility and his level of "supervision" is obviously seriously lacking. I just told the boys when they told me the stories about getting shot... if they're out with weapons - you go inside... period. Tell mom. She'll take action.
Please let me know about anything involving Joker and his "arsenal." There is a lot of risk there.
I'll let you know what their version of events is tonight. I think the "break" was the right thing to do. Here's hoping Mr. Neighbor is made abundantly clear about the arrangement by Mrs. Neighbor.
~LM
I spoke to the boys after school and neither of them have any recollection of Mr. Neighbor saying anything to them, let alone what PEW believes she heard from her front porch. No big deal to me, mind you, the situation needed to be addressed regardless.
LM,So, it appears for now that we're all clear about how things are going to be going forward. I was certain that when I refused to "be the bad guy" on her behalf, that would be the end of the discussion, but she (for now) took it in stride. I don't want to have to "wait" until something more serious happens (like another bb-gun attack or a cross-bow mishap) - but given how I'm likely portrayed in that neighborhood anyway, the LAST thing I need to be doing is strolling on into that clusterflod and being the big, bad concerned father who will then fit exactly what she has described to them.
Mrs. Neighbor says, he doesn't have any bb's and the bow is away. If that changes I will certainly take action. She agreed that they need the break too. She also assured me that she was going to talk to Mr. Neighbor about the way he handled it. I'll wait to hear from you about what the boys say.
~PEW
Her neighbors. Her problem. She needs to deal with it. And if something like the bb-gun incident happens ever again and I hear about it - they'll all pay a very steep price. Hopefully, it won't be because one of the boys lost an eye or was found in the driveway with an arrow sticking out of his chest.






10 comments:
So sorry about the neighbor thing.
I grew up next to one of those kinds of kids--who's dad happened to be the police chief.:(
We lived next to a drug addict and her evil child for a while(the kid used to drown puppies and threatened to kill my DH and she was 7)--until the drug addict overdosed and died. The kid and her infant brother were adopted out.
You are smart--she wanted YOU to deal with it because she has no clue.
I feel so sorry for the boys. Living next to terrorists, while living WITH a terrorist. Yuck.
Wasn't her sudden civility simply a ploy to get you to take action she doesn't have the guts to do?
Sure it was. However, I made it clear up-front that this was her issue to remedy in its current state.
I would have lost money betting that the conversation would have ended there... or she would have flown into a blaming rage about how I don't care about the welfare of the children... or sarcastically questioning my manhood and sexuality since I wouldn't confront Mr. Neighbor...
She remained civil and (on her say-so) called Mrs. Neighbor to discuss the situation and (hopefully) will employ one or more of the immediate solutions I suggested.
Tis truly a rare moment indeed!
Amazing. She must be taking her medication or something. Whatever the reason, how cool was that to have a rational, adult interaction resulting in her handling the situation appropriately.
I completely agree with blueydmuse. We have those moments of startling clarity, where I wonder if we're off on some wonderful, sunny, happy road. That actually occurred consistently between the months of January and April of 2007.
Then... well, you know. :)
I'm glad that you two were able to have a reasonable conversation and that she was sane enough to go and deal with the neighbors. I don't think this is the last you've heard of it, and it's entirely possible that her sheer insanity will do nothing in the future but escalate it all, but at least you have a reprieve for the moment.
Wow... what a downer of a comment. Sorry. :)
On the upside, good for you for sticking to your guns and making her handle it!
If past performance is indicative of future returns... this will not end well.
While I appreciate the sentiment of blueydmuse and Steph... the reality is almost exclusively the "downer" result you mention, Steph.
What else do we have but hope? All I can do is hope it will end differently. If it does, it will be startling.
The only thing that I know for sure has happened - is that she remained civil on the phone... if only because she wanted me to deal with it instead of her... nothing more and nothing less.
We'll see what happens.
Oh dear, I hate having the 'downer' reaction too! I guess it is a relief to have a hiatus when the PEW acts like a rational human being, but...When our PEW does this my heart sinks and I become hyper-vigilant--from bitter experience. I have to tread carefully with my husband, too, as he will feel relieved and even hopeful, and I will sound like a Negative Nag. (Then we may have a disagreement... great).
What inevitably happens is that this is a prelude to further invitations to get involved, with the neighbour, teacher, scout leader, friend etc. becoming more and more demonised by PEW. When my husband then draws the line, PEW starts with the vicious accusations and we go back into the whole downward spiral.
On our last visit with the children, she took the opportunity at the very end-on the doorstep- during the farewells to pull my husband aside and start going on about a neighbour's dangerous dog(how about that for projection?). He clearly was expected 1. to give advice, 2. to intervene, 3. (and most important) to rush to the aid of poor victimised PEW. He had the same measured response that you had to your PEW, which resulted in a violent row in front of the children and a string of accusing emails. So, we were right back to re-stating the boundaries of parallel parenting--AGAIN.
Just curious what DW feels at this juncture? Sorry to be another cold-water-pourer!!
GGRR writes: Just curious what DW feels at this juncture?
Funny you should ask. DW said (again), "She wants you" and then we just laughed.
No one has cold-watered me. I have no expectations that this will be the end of it or that it won't escalate, if only with the neighbors.
GGRR - if you haven't already checked out the low-contact posts... do so. I wouldn't let PEW "take me aside" to do a rage in front of the children anymore. The type of communication described in this incident is very infrequent. I don't respond (most of the time) to any hostile emails and if she gets mouthy on the phone - I hang it up without warning.
I love what DW says: she's so right!!
Hmmm, handling that leave-taking. Here's what happened: I wasn't there-I was back in the hotel. (We were visiting kids in their home town which is a plane flight from where we live). Husband dropped them with gear, sleeping bags etc. She appeared and seemed to be saying goodbye---then launched.
Lessons learned? Next time he visited, he dropped kids in driveway and didn't go into house.
Even so, she keeps trying and when she engages in a seemingly sane or socially nice way, he does sometimes get seduced back into an interaction. I think he is very uncomfortable with seeming ungracious and not the nice guy (and she takes every opportunity to point out his 'ungracious' behaviour to him, like an injured saint). I absolutely hate the process because I can always see what is coming in the follow-up to this. I am sure I annoy him by pointing this out, but I also feel so traumatised by her repeating behaviour that I dread the sequellae to his slip up.
I feel that one of the results of living with a BPD spouse is that my husband has developed a sort of memory lapse about the repeating horrendous behaviour. I guess when they were together it enabled him to survive in the marriage, because if he really acknowledged episode after episode, it would be unbearable. But when he has these lapses now, I become the one who remembers and who holds the awareness. I find it very distressing and exhausting to have to point it out and sometimes experience my husband becoming defensive and cross .
I often wonder how it feels for you, LM, to be rereading the historic exchanges you post. It must be both cathartic (after all, we are certainly witnessing and confirming the craziness of it all-you are not alone), but also very painful to have to remember and not compartmentalise, but incorporate into your overall psyche such abuse...
Dunno if anyone is following comments, figured I'd update... as expected, the "time away from one another" didn't last very long.
My guess is that actually spending some one-on-one time with the kids without the next-door-terrors running interference was too much to ask.
Post a Comment